Current Events > The GameFAQs mods should be required to respond when upholding a moderation.

(+) Yeah! (+)

If they don't feel like defending the moderation? It should auto-overturn. Don't just let them uphold with no explanation.

Nah.

The system literally doesn't give them the option anymore. Not even when it's passed on to a lead mod to make the final call. The only time they can explain is when originally moderating; if you want more than that, you need to know about, and use, Hellhole (and there's no guarantee you'll get an answer).

Considering your gimmick is incel shit you certainly deserved it

It's been months and this dude is literally still upset he got modded for trolling about being trans

AngelicRadiance posted...

Considering your gimmick is incel shit you certainly deserved it

I made a topic about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, that was a simple question. I got warned for trolling.

Bio1590 posted...

It's been months and this dude is literally still upset he got modded for trolling about being trans

Were you expecting some big event in his life to happen?

That was literally the most exciting part of his year.

Bio1590 posted...

It's been months and this dude is literally still upset he got modded for trolling about being trans

Says the guy who complains about things he believes people posted years ago.

I usually love nodding all alone

Bio1590 posted...

It's been months and this dude is literally still upset he got modded for trolling about being trans

Man doesn't Bio have better things to use brain space on over some anonymous message board post literally months ago?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Misinformation is a TOS violation.

I agree. I rarely get modded but I have and once was left confused as to what exactly was wrong with what I said if I know I can work towards not doing it again

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

The fact that it was once suspected to be true but later disproven doesn't make it "not misinformation". If you're stating or implying that disproven claims are true, it is misinformation.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Now tell us the detail you're leaving out. Or a topic ID.

Old system: My moderation got upheld because the mods biased against me acted on it!

Gamefaqs changes to a vote-based dispute system: My moderation got upheld because the moderators dont have to respond to me anymore!

Literally have seen both of these arguments before and theyre both equally exasperating

Alpha218 posted...

Old system: My moderation got upheld because the mods biased against me acted on it!

Gamefaqs changes to a vote-based dispute system: My moderation got upheld because the moderators dont have to respond to me anymore!

Literally have seen both of these arguments before and theyre both equally exasperating

Nobody in their right mind would think my most recent moderation is worth a warning. That's why I believe that only the original moderator voted to uphold it.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

TCs seems to be. But we all know TC is a disingenuous troll, right?

Nobody tell him about SCOTUS

Orlando_Jordan posted...

Nobody in their right mind would think my most recent moderation is worth a warning. That's why I believe that only the original moderator voted to uphold it.

The original moderator cannot vote on their disputed moderations. That would defeat the purpose of the voting as it would generally weight it against the user from the get-go.

Also you should be arguing the substance of the moderation, not the punishment. A moderation being too harsh wont get it overturned; it should only be overturned if it wasnt something that was a violation of the rules.

Trumble posted...

Says the guy who complains about things he believes people posted years ago.

You know what you posted lmao, you're just able to hide behind the fact it was like 5 or 6 alt accounts back for you.

And it's not like TC even denies he got modded for claiming he's trans. That's what started his whole other gimmick with making these topics every time he gets Warned or Purg'd.

Nah I never read the uphold response anyway

Orlando_Jordan posted...

Nobody in their right mind would think my most recent moderation is worth a warning. That's why I believe that only the original moderator voted to uphold it.

Considering your history a warning was perfectly fair

Alpha218 posted...

The original moderator cannot vote on their disputed moderations. That would defeat the purpose of the voting as it would generally weight it against the user from the get-go.

Also you should be arguing the substance of the moderation, not the punishment. A moderation being too harsh wont get it overturned; it should only be overturned if it wasnt something that was a violation of the rules.

Besides the fact that that's complete BS, my post literally wasn't a TOU violation at all. It was a simple question about a campaign promise.

Orlando_Jordan posted...

Besides the fact that that's complete BS, my post literally wasn't a TOU violation at all. It was a simple question about a campaign promise.

Yeah that's bullshit.

Keep whining and earn that suspension.

AldousIsDead posted...

Keep whining and earn that suspension.

Whining is not a suspendable offense. Hope this helps.

If it were I wouldn't have to look at this, true.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


One could definitely argue that not being able to contest the punishment is "complete BS" (in the sense of that it shouldn't be the rule, not in the sense of that it isn't).

Did widdle Orwando get a big ol moddie woddie? :*(

the mods team didn't even care when someone dispute a moderation.
they keep each other's back on bad moderations, just like the cops covering other bad cops.

it's not about political bias, the system is just rigged against the posters.

I don't know OP's backstory, but there was one time where I got modded for pointing out how another frequently suspended user's racist history can be searched up on google within 5 seconds when he was grandstanding about how he was never racist against anybody, and I was somewhat peeved when I didn't get jack diddly shit for a response when I made an appeal. Literally nothing, not even a notification saying "your moderation was upheld".

TC you do not get the benefit of the doubt. All you do is continue the same sad gimmick and crap up this board nonstop. But you already knew all this and are just fishing for responses.