Current Events > High school teacher kills herself after she's busted for sex with students

(+) Yeah! (+)

Iloveyou5 posted...

Hell. If you post women in their 20s this board will get nervous as all hell and call you a pedo.

I always lol at topics where someone posts a pic and asks if they're the person is attractive and you get people asking how old they are before answering.
They think they're hot already but need to know the age before they say it outloud

---

kelemvor posted...

So if you have sex with a 17 year, 11 month, 30 day old women you are a pedophile in the eyes of this board. One day later and you are a porn star.

Definitions matter. The woman wasn't a pedophile. Just a creep with a sad life, probably.

by this logic that means Matt Gaetz wasnt a pedo, but a man with a sad life

---

Jerry Seinfeld is a pedo but nobody calls that out. So is JayZ

---

Good. I feel a little bit better knowing she used a shotgun too.

---

Pedophile
Ephebophile

She's a rapist.

And the people going "But but fucking teenagers(Below 18) as an adult is technically legal so...." yeah, you're doing yourselves no favors.

Child marriage is "legal" in some parts of America. Are you going to defend that as well?


---

Dark_SilverX posted...

by this logic that means Matt Gaetz wasnt a pedo, but a man with a sad life

I had to look him up. Nope, not a pedo. Just a fucking piece of shit, I'm sure. Also, it's all "alleged" so whatever.

Umbreon posted...

Pedophile
Ephebophile

She's a rapist.

And the people going "But but fucking teenagers(Below 18) as an adult is technically legal so...." yeah, you're doing yourselves no favors.

Child marriage is "legal" in some parts of America. Are you going to defend that as well?

Nope, I'm not defending anything but my Grandma was legally married at 16 and my Mom was conceived shortly after. It was all legal and I'm glad I was born, truth be told.

What the fuck, are you guys actually coming after me for saying sex with a older teenager is pedophilia??? LOL. You can literally pick up a dictionary and know that isn't true.

skermac posted...

i hate them too, but this teacher was not one because her victims were not prepubescent

Without freaking fail.

---

kelemvor posted...

Nope, I'm not defending anything but my Grandma was legally married at 16 and my Mom was conceived shortly after. It was all legal and I'm glad I was born, truth be told.

Cool. But that's still too fucking young for someone to be married. "Legally" the age used to be 12. Depending on circumstances that's still the case.

For "some reason", girls can legally be married off at a younger age than boys. In some states there's technically no minimum age for getting married. If the parents approve and a judge approve, a prepubescent could be "legally" married.

Absolutely none of this makes it even remotely okay.

---

A former English teacher from my high school did the same thing around 2013-14. Dude organized our senior trip and everything. When he got indicted for child porn he slit his throat in a school parking lot.

---

Kakapo posted...

Without freaking fail.

Try getting it right and people wouldn't feel the need to correct you.

---

VitalGetPrank posted...

Try getting it right and people wouldn't feel the need to correct you.

This is not a thing normal, healthy people obsess over or feel the need to use to deflect from child rape skermac

---

RebelElite791 posted...

This is not a thing normal, healthy people obsess over or feel the need to use to deflect from child rape skermac

I guess from a few other posts I should point out Im not skermac, but its not really deflecting cuz you choose to not acknowledge a fact presented and then move on. Why do people feel the need to argue semantics for the wrong definition of words instead of just acknowledging they were using incorrect words? Then they deflect on the other person with a strawman. Its hilarious ignorant, yet its always that person shitting on someone (such as skermac itt) acting like they are defending a rapist, pedos, etc.

It doesnt change what the person did but if someone wants to clarify the definition, so fucking whatthat doesnt mean theyre supporting the person.

Just as people want to rip on skermac, why cant you just accept youre all hung-up on the fact you cant just accept there is a difference in word definitions, the wrong usage has become a norm, and its a technicality but isnt really important to the topic purpose so move on and let it go.

---

Oh and here's another 10 amp alt. Do y'all have a little creepy Discord together or something?

And again, explain why you feel the need to enter a topic about a woman who raped children and argue technicalities over the terms used to describe her.

---

"the first time it's actually rape."

Boy we're getting all the best takes ITT

---

RebelElite791 posted...

Oh and here's another 10 amp alt. Do y'all have a little creepy Discord together or something?

And again, explain why you feel the need to enter a topic about a woman who raped children and argue technicalities over the terms used to describe her.

Because I argue technicalities around here when I please and you can pull the, Oh trolling, alt, deflecting, blah blah shit all you want but it doesnt change the facts.

I also dont communicate to any other user on these boards outside of this site and have never used discord. If anything, Im usually arguing with skermac and other users here outside of maybe a few people in the stock market topics.

At the end of the day, youre going on about someone that you could just accept chose to clarify a technicality but got hung up yourself to make it a thing. It would end sooner if you just moved on yourself but instead argue a bunch of other posters are alts or a hive or some deluded shit. Likemaybe youre just the problem yourself.

---

RebelElite791 posted...

And again, explain why you feel the need to enter a topic about a woman who raped children and argue technicalities over the terms used to describe her.

---

A teacher in my area killed himself after he was fired for showing internet porn to students.

---

VioletMassacre posted...

You could say the same thing for everyone screming "pedo" at everything like a fucking parrot.

Also without freaking fail, its the grooming guy.


---

Kakapo posted...

Also without freaking fail, its the grooming guy.

No kidding. Between him and those whom are more interested in arguing semantics in terminology when discussing a case of statutory rape, this thread is bringing out all the winners...

---

VioletMassacre posted...

This.. is a bad comparison. You don't need a license to have sex. It's also much easier to do than driving, and you won't endanger others life. That is if they don't kill themselves like in this case. >_>

That's probably one of the dumbest things I ever read. You obviously didn't get the point of my post, which was on why knowledge has nothing to do with one's ability to give consent. It has nothing to do with whether or not one's easier than the other lmao or even about whether or not somebody's life is in danger. Please, just because something disagrees with your purview, don't disregard basic logic

---

Iloveyou5 posted...

Jerry Seinfeld is a pedo but nobody calls that out. So is JayZ

How is Jay a pedo? He didn't even meet Bey until she was already 18.

---

Even though the rapist is dead the victims still need reparations

Kloe_Rinz posted...

Even though the rapist is dead the victims still need reparations

And where would these "reparations" come from? I'm assuming all assets of the teachers estate have already been given away to various family members already.

---

Lord_Shadow_19 posted...

And where would these "reparations" come from? I'm assuming all assets of the teachers estate have already been given away to various family members already.

her will should have been put on hold until after any legal proceedings. The victims should take priority and the estate should pay off every cent possible. The rest should come from the school if private, state if not

Dat_Cracka_Jax posted...

I always lol at topics where someone posts a pic and asks if they're the person is attractive and you get people asking how old they are before answering.
They think they're hot already but need to know the age before they say it outloud

Yeeeeup

---

VitalGetPrank posted...

It's an important distinction to make

It's not though. Diddling kids is not ok no matter what.

---

DocDelicious posted...

It's not though. Diddling kids is not ok no matter what.

So you would say that fucking a 7 year old is exactly as bad as fucking a 17 year old?

And the person fucking the 7 year old probably has the same kind of psychological issues as the one fucking the 17 year old?

This is obviously ridiculous, but we pretend it's not because it's fun to call people pedophiles. The insult has just the right amount of cut to it.

---

COVxy posted...

So you would say that fucking a 7 year old is exactly as bad as fucking a 17 year old?

And the person fucking the 7 year old probably has the same kind of psychological issues as the one fucking the 17 year old?

This is obviously ridiculous, but we pretend it's not because it's fun to call people pedophiles. The insult has just the right amount of cut to it.

What kind of question is that? Of course they're both equally as awful and the offenders absolutely have the same sort of mental issues.

Fucking kids is not ok. There is no grey area.
It is not ok for an adult to fuck a child. End of discussion. Just the fact that someone would think there is a grey area to this demonstrates that they have some serious problems of their own.

---

DocDelicious posted...

Of course they're both equally as awful and the offenders absolutely have the same sort of mental issues.

Get your head checked lol.

---

You're also allowed to be attracted to teens as an adult, but having sex with them is generally not a good idea.

---

DocDelicious posted...

What kind of question is that? Of course they're both equally as awful and the offenders absolutely have the same sort of mental issues.

17 is legal in the majority of US states and the western world in fact.

---

WTF this thread?
Feel like I need a shower.

VioletMassacre posted...

And yet people think I have a problem.

You have a problem if you think a teacher having sex with a student is okay. Even if the student was 18, it's not.

---

VioletMassacre posted...

Ive literally never said its ok for a teacher to be with their students, try again.

VioletMassacre posted...

Is this the first time it's actually rape?

You implied that there are times it could not be rape, except the power dynamic alone means the student of the teacher can't legally consent.


---

CalypsoDoom posted...

People ITT know exactly what they're doing by playing semantics because when we call people out we're the ones who will be modded, not them.

Only thing I have to say is at least she can't harm more children.

If you get modded it's because you let your emotions get the better of you and lash out with insults. That's very much on you and not on us.

---

VioletMassacre posted...

Theres still a huge difference between statutory and literally forcing someone. Thats the point.

This is acceptable to say on this board in 2021. Just think about that for a second.

Davos posted...

This is acceptable to say on this board in 2021. Just think about that for a second.

Why wouldn't it be, sorry the world isn't as black/white as you think it is.

---

VitalGetPrank posted...

Why wouldn't it be, sorry the world isn't as black/white as you think it is.

I live in the real world guy not internet safe spaces like this one. Where people like you are protected.

Davos posted...

I live in the real world guy not internet safe spaces like this one. Where people like you are protected.

Sorry you can't take opposing viewpoints.

---

The amount of "It's not actually pedophilia" on this thread is weird.

No one gives a shit. Like no one. Banging someone underage? Pedophilia. You can argue until you're running out of breath but in the end no one will care. At best you seem pedantic arguing over which term is more appropriate for people who abuse their power positions on children, at worst you see apologetic for it.


---

Davos posted...

Yeah I don't entertain the opposite view to raping children. Almost nobody in the real world does. Maybe one day a few people in this thread will find that out the hard way.

Nobody's saying she didn't rape them, considering her looks it's pretty likely she did. Just that throwing around pedophile when it doesn't apply makes you look uninformed and small-minded.

---

When you're talking about someone who did this with multiple students whom she met in class, I don't think there's honestly a huge distinction between whether they were 5 or 15. They were children to her in the context in which she had sex with them. The word you use to describe that situation makes literally no difference.

---