Current Events > Police shoot dog in its own yard *GRAPHIC VIDEO*

(+) Yeah! (+)

what's funny is that you have these types who hate all cops until they need them, but they'll say "i never needed them!!"

like, okay, if so, congrats on living that sheltered internet denizen life where you never interacted with cops? not surprising that those types also wanna pretend that the one dog biting the other wasn't the aggressor. plastic participation trophies all around for the mental gymnastics on display

---

are you talking to me

Lysandear posted...

are you talking to me

did i quote you

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

did i quote you

No but I quoted you.

---

why you being flippant? you were the last post before me, by a good bit, then a bit after me you posted that. i didn't know bemoaning generalities was a thing in specific ce threads

viewmaster_pi posted...

what's funny is that you have these types who hate all cops until they need them, but they'll say "i never needed them!!"

like, okay, if so, congrats on living that sheltered internet denizen life where you never interacted with cops? not surprising that those types also wanna pretend that the one dog biting the other wasn't the aggressor. plastic participation trophies all around for the mental gymnastics on display

Imagine caping this hard for unnecessary violence towards a defenseless animal


---

ReturnOfThaJedi posted...

unnecessary violence towards a defenseless animal

and the daytime emmy for best performance in drama goes to...

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

and the daytime emmy for best performance in drama goes to...

Bruh youre literally the only person in this thread defending this shit. Your placing the blame on the dog for being a dog and doing dog stuff, but not on trained policeman and his trained K9. Any sane person would have seen the dog in the yard and reigned in the dogs leash to keep it away from the fence. This poorly trained cop didnt, and put his dog in a situation where it could be hurt. Does the cop pull his dogs leash to separate the two? No, he FUCKING SHOOTS THE DOG. In what world do you live in where that is ok?

---

i pretty much consider pets the same thing as furniture and even im horrified by this. i gotta assume anyone defending it is just tryna rile people up

you can see him pull the dog back, but that's after the other bites it and locks down. the "trained" dog is still just a fucking animal, it can't be programmed. it doesn't even go straight for the fence, it takes a left before the cop can even pull it back. you're seeing what you wanna see because we HATE cops on CE, i get it. believe me.

---

Lysandear posted...

i pretty much consider pets the same thing as furniture and even im horrified by this. i gotta assume anyone defending it is just tryna rile people up

it's really as simple as "which dog bit first?" but CE wants to play games so anyone BUT the aggressive dog is to blame

when someone on a racist tirade in public gets knocked out, oh well, not losing sleep, he got what he got, even if there could have been a nonviolent outcome: not an unpopular opinion here

when an aggressive dog bites another one and gets shot, oh well, not losing sleep, he got what he got, even if there could have been a nonviolent outcome:
public enemy #1

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

you can see him pull the dog back, but that's after the other bites it and locks down. the "trained" dog is still just a fucking animal, it can't be programmed. it doesn't even go straight for the fence, it takes a left before the cop can even pull it back. you're seeing what you wanna see because we HATE cops on CE, i get it. believe me.

The dog literally sticks its face through the fence.

And what the fuck do you mean they cant be programmed. They can be programmed to find drugs, people, and explosives. They can be programmed to attack on command as well as ceasing attack on command.

All that aside, youre telling me that the most logical response to this situation was to shoot the dog in the face?

---

ReturnOfThaJedi posted...

All that aside, youre telling me that the most logical response to this situation was to shoot the dog in the face?

i already said no to that before anyone even started arguing with me, lol

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

i already said no to that before anyone even started arguing with me, lol

So let me ask you this. At what point does the officer become responsible for securing his dog? Because the civilians dog is inside a fence and can be argued that its defending its home from a strange dog.

---

everybody's responsible for securing their dog, but they're animals. shit happens. if my dog poked its nose through a fence, i'd be quick to pull it out, but i sure wouldn't just assume the dog on the other side will flip its shit and go beartrap mode on mine. hell, dogs that fail aggression tests often get put down before they're even considered for adoption

---

Another example of why all police should be considered enemies of the American people. This looks racially motivated too as mentioned above in a previous post, no surprise there...

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

what's funny is that you have these types who hate all cops until they need them, but they'll say "i never needed them!!"

like, okay, if so, congrats on living that sheltered internet denizen life where you never interacted with cops? not surprising that those types also wanna pretend that the one dog biting the other wasn't the aggressor. plastic participation trophies all around for the mental gymnastics on display

The only thing I need the cops for is to bag and tag someone if they endanger my life. So I'm not the one to come at like that for real.

With that being said this is pretty low effort trolling or just straight up bootlicking (and I don't even say that term normally). The dog that got shot was inside a fence. The cop with a dog on a leash should not have let it that close.

---

um. are graphic videos allowed here? on the site where nipples are bad?

---

Why not shoot your own dog if its the one that lost control, the other dog is in his own territory doing what a dog does

---

jesus you guys are just disingenuous as fuck. one dog SNIFFS the other: omg it lost control!!!!

one dog BITES the other: lol just doing what dogs do :^)

---

Just noticed theres a second tiny dog that they wanted to shoot but it was so quick and clever they could not shoot it in time

---

twitterfriends posted...

Just noticed theres a second tiny dog that they wanted to shoot but it was so quick and clever they could not shoot it in time

you mean the one that jumped out through the fence and ran off to (?) and no one even noticed except the one guy who ignored it? this is the dumb, hyperdramatic shit that keeps me from taking the acab club seriously.

---

viewmaster bootlickin hard in dis topic

---

That one scene in every horror/serious action movie with a dog: The topic

Looked gf posted...

viewmaster bootlickin hard in dis topic

i'm so sorry for going against the CE groupthink

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

what's funny is that you have these types who hate all cops until they need them

Hahahahahahaha

---

K9's are supposed to be trained and non-reactive to other dogs. The other dog was doing what dogs with territorial drive do, the handler of the K9 should have reigned the dog in. If I can have control over my large dog when other dogs run up to the fence I'd expect that a working K9 would be non-reactive to other dogs and its handler to have control over it.

---

"territorial drive" lol holy shit. if that """territorial drive""" kicked in and it bit a kid who got too close to the fence, are you actually going to tell me you'd blame the kid and parents before the dog for being aggressive, or the owner for having a fence that can't properly keep things in and out? dogs with- ahem- territorial drive- get put to sleep...

like am i actually reading things posted by real people? or is this like a neural network test to see how far an AI can go to fabricate reason after reason that the aggressive dog that bit first isn't to blame?

---

If somebody stuck their hand into the fence and got bit, no I wouldn't blame the dog or feel that the dog should be killed.

viewmaster_pi posted...

"territorial drive" lol holy shit. if that """territorial drive""" kicked in and it bit a kid who got too close to the fence, are you actually going to tell me you'd blame the kid and parents before the dog for being aggressive, or the owner for having a fence that can't properly keep things in and out? dogs with- ahem- territorial drive- get put to sleep...

like am i actually reading things posted by real people? or is this like a neural network test to see how far an AI can go to fabricate reason after reason that the aggressive dog that bit first isn't to blame?

Stop acting like you know about canine behavior. Owners/handlers are responsible for controlling their animals. Dogs are going to be dogs, they're going to be territorial. I'd expect a highly trained K9 to be non-reactive to an untrained dog that's behind a fence, and the handler to have control over the dog. The handler is the one that's on the other side of the fence, with a leash.

---

well i would. if you're dumping your dog in the front yard all day, it should be socially stable enough not to chomp passersby who don't know better, like a kid or other dog. in real life, i think this isn't a controversial opinion. things always get silly once the internet bleeding-hearts start up

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

well i would. if you're dumping your dog in the front yard all day, it should be socially stable enough not to chomp passersby who don't know better, like a kid or other dog. in real life, i think this isn't a controversial opinion. things always get silly once the internet bleeding-hearts start up

Just because a dog will react to another dog, it does not mean that it will "chomp at a passerby". Stop it, animal aggression and human aggression are two different traits.

---

Taharqa_ posted...

I'd expect a highly trained K9 to be non-reactive to an untrained dog that's behind a fence

yeah. but shit happens. it's an animal, it's not perfect. i'd also expect the family good-boy behind the fence not to bite and latch immediately, but shit happens. difference is the K9 didn't bite first

if something comes up and it turns out the K9 did actually get snippy first, I'll eat crow. guess we'll see

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

well i would. if you're dumping your dog in the front yard all day, it should be socially stable enough not to chomp passersby who don't know better, like a kid or other dog. in real life, i think this isn't a controversial opinion. things always get silly once the internet bleeding-hearts start up

Well it's not a completely unreasonable opinion. I certainly don't think less of anyone for it.

Yes, it would be nice if dogs were better behaved. But I think people do have the right to keep dogs that are more protective oriented as long as they stay within the confines of their property. And that if somebody or another animal trespasses into that property, they need to take accountability instead of blaming the dog on the property.

Taharqa_ posted...

Just because a dog will react to another dog, it does not mean that it will "chomp at a passerby".

i mean... it did. but okay cesar millan

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

are you actually going to tell me you'd blame the kid and parents

If a kid stuck his hand through a fence with a dog in it, and got his hand bit, yes the kid is to blame.

That isn't even like a question. That is why you have a fence.

I don't know what state/country you are in but if somebody called animal control and said "my little kid stuck his hand through a fence and a dog bit him put him down" they are gonna be like "hell no tell your kid to stop putting his hands inside other people's fences".

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

i mean... it did. but okay cesar millan

It reacted to the other dog. You were trying to say that such a dog would react aggressively indiscriminately to dogs and people.

---

if you want to keep a "protective" dog, and therefor value protection or privacy, why the fuck do they have a fence with bars wide enough for entire animals to stick their heads or even jump through, as seen in the video where the small dog just... leaves? lol

that was a dog, right? not like a muskrat or... nutria or something?

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

oh shut the fuck up already. or at least pull this shit on your main

youre the one shitposting here, not me, ask most people ITT @viewmaster_pi

---

don't spam me with the @ shit, i'm not playing games with you

---

The dog owner was irresponsible for having a fence the dog could reach any part of itself out of.

The cop was horribly negligent, and the dog was definitely not trained unless this is just a one in a thousand freak out that likely does happen even with the best trained dog.

I dont really know the proper way he should have handled the situation after the attack started, but I doubt that was it.

viewmaster_pi posted...

you can see him pull the dog back, but that's after the other bites it and locks down. the "trained" dog is still just a fucking animal, it can't be programmed. it doesn't even go straight for the fence, it takes a left before the cop can even pull it back. you're seeing what you wanna see because we HATE cops on CE, i get it. believe me.

and again, the cops first reaction was to muder via shot in the head. Come on.

so thats how they work, either do nothing or shoot in the head?

why the fuck do they have tasers, pepper gas, batons and flashlights? Why the fuck are they trained?

but most important, why did they decide to shoot once the black woman appeared (oh, she is black, I can shoot the dog) and why did one of them started walking towards her in a wassup? Way after she witnessed the shooting?


---

viewmaster_pi posted...

don't spam me with the @ shit, i'm not playing games with you

translation: i admit defeat

---

Question to the other people ITT - is viewmaster trolling or is he related to a cop?

---

TopKekBro posted...

and again, the cops first reaction was to muder via shot in the head. Come on.

so thats how they work, either do nothing or shoot in the head?

why the fuck do they have tasers, pepper gas, batons and flashlights? Why the fuck are they trained?

for the 4th time, allow me to regurgitate that i already said the first reaction being to kill it wasn't right. and this is the 2nd time i've repeated it to you specifically, so... you're seeing what you want to see

TopKekBro posted...

but most important, why did they decide to shoot once the black woman appeared (oh, she is black, I can shoot the dog) and why did one of them started walking towards her in a wassup? Way after she witnessed the shooting?

you're definitely seeing what you want to see

---

You're also missing the point that a K9 officer is supposed to keep that leash tight and away from other dogs.

It is called a harness or a choker chain.

The officer is the one who fucked up here, on multiple levels, I'm not one of the ACAB riot supporting crew AT ALL, but I'm tired of the cops not being held accountable for shit like this.

Dude shouldn't be a cop if he's that big of a fuckup. Period. I'm not saying to defund them or hang and quarter the guy, but cops shoot too many fuckin dogs. Hell the ATF started this trend shooting the dog at Ruby Ridge. That was like 30 years ago.

---

viewmaster_pi posted...

for the 4th time, allow me to regurgitate that i already said the first reaction being to kill it wasn't right.

so what are you raging about then? You agree it wasnt right, end of story?

---

TopKekBro posted...

translation: i admit defeat

actually you're just obnoxious, obsessively argumentative, and don't even seem like you're genuine. it feels fake, like it's just ammunition for you to use to be annoying about. you're back, so you know i'm already responding to people in the thread, so the only reason you're tagging me is to be extra annoying

---

There is something seriously wrong with the cops in Detroit. Fuckers make Michael Vick look like a saint

Detroit police made headlines for killing 54 dogs in 2017, a figure that doubled those killed by Chicago police officers in the same year. According to destruction of animal reports, one unidentified Detroit police officer killed more than 80 dogs throughout his career.
...
Instead of choosing to not use force against dogs, the City is now claiming DPD officers have a right to kill dogs if they are not licensed.

https://bit.ly/3aTdqIm

Oh, and you thought the cops would hold the officer responsible? Of course not! Hell, they are blaming the owner for an illegally constructed fence

The Detroit PD just told us, the officer who shot the dog did nothing wrong. They say the cop was looking for a gun an armed suspect had discarded, and was with her police dog that was on a leash. Short story -- the law required the cop to control her dog and stay away from a fence where a dog was legally on the other side -- contained on its property, but she didn't and the dogs began fighting.

The PD says the only way the cop could extricate her dog from the pitbull's mouth was to shoot it. The law couldn't be clearer -- the cop -- who had her dog on a leash -- did not have control of her dog, because she should have kept it away from the fence.And, get this ... the PD is saying the fence was illegally constructed ... as if that mattered.

https://www.tmz.com/2020/08/22/detroit-cop-allegedly-shoots-kills-fenced-dog-attack-k9/
---