Current Events > Woman duped into recording online video of her flubbadup by fake gynecologist.

(+) Yeah! (+)

A Russian woman has warned against fake online gynaecologists during the lockdown after she was blackmailed by a bogus doctor. The victim, from the Kaluga, 160 miles south of Moscow, sought help from her hospital and an online forum but was refused an appointment due to the lockdown and a ban on nonessential consultations.

The woman in her 30s, named Maria, was soon afterwards approached online by a 'gynaecologist' named Arnold Karapetyan who offered her a web consultation. After an initial exchange he told her he suspected she had genital herpes, but advised 'a gynaecological check is needed to exclude other more negative options'.

This could be carried out online via her smartphone camera, he told her.

Before agreeing she tried to check him online and felt his site - which later was revealed as fake - appeared genuine, she told NTV. He told her he would charge 33 for a private appointment and wrote to her: 'I have 30 years of work experience.

'Read the reviews. I GUARANTEE if something goes wrong, I will return you the money. I accept several online patients every day. This is today's reality.'

She later went back to him saying she was suffering from itching. The intimate session filmed on her smartphone lasted 40 minutes and in advance he had told her to ensure strong lighting.

Immediately after it was over, the doctor messaged her: 'The session was recorded. If you do not want this video to be sent to all your friends, transfer me 200,000 roubles by noon. Time is running out.'

Distraught, Maria did not pay but turned to lawyer Timur Marshani who found that the 'gynaecologist' had used a picture belonging to a real doctor and a false name.

Police are now looking into the lockdown fraud and there are suspicions the 'gynaecologist' who fluently used medical terms had other victims.

'I don't even want to tell my close friends... because I'm ashamed,' admitted Maria 'I'm just ashamed that I believed it.'

He instructed her exactly how to set up the camera for the session, she said.

'He told me how to install it (and) what position should I take so that he can see the problem that I had.'


Full Article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8272801/Woman-blackmailed-fake-Russian-gynaecologist.html
https://i.imgur.com/vOz3bPA.jpg

Wow, that guy is a real piece of shit.

That's a lot of effort to go to just fuck with some scared women during a global pandemic.
---

Why didn't you just type vagina?
---

Why do a con just to have chicks send nasty diseased vagina pics at you? It would've been more beneficial to pretend to be a mammologist and see some sweet boobs before you eventually get caught >_>

---

FigureOfSpeech posted...

Why didn't you just type vagina?

I thought you weren't allowed to in topic titles
---

Was it Dr. Bob Vageen?

---

UnfairRepresent posted...

I thought you weren't allowed to in topic titles

I thought maybe you were right when I read this post because I think that was a rule at one point, but apparently you can. I just tested it out.
---

FigureOfSpeech posted...

I thought maybe you were right when I read this post because I think that was a rule at one point, but apparently you can. I just tested it out.

good to know

I think that's because they changed the censorship rules
---

FigureOfSpeech posted...

I thought maybe you were right when I read this post because I think that was a rule at one point, but apparently you can. I just tested it out.

UR is trolling you. He just puts stupid shit in titles for clickbait

There were a number of words that couldn't be in titles but were otherwise fine. That was silly. They got rid of that during a censor update probably.
---

Axiom posted...

UR is trolling you. He just puts stupid shit in titles for clickbait

sigless user logic

FigureOfSpeech posted...

There were a number of words that couldn't be in titles but were otherwise fine. That was silly. They got rid of that during a censor update probably.

makes sense since the site defaults to censoring them anyway
---

cjs28 posted...

Why do a con just to have chicks send nasty diseased vagina pics at you? It would've been more beneficial to pretend to be a mammologist and see some sweet boobs before you eventually get caught >_>

Probably harder to blackmail
---

rookie mistake

never show your face when you're sending your no-no's to someone

---

cjs28 posted...

Why do a con just to have chicks send nasty diseased vagina pics at you?

because vagina pics are better material to blackmail with than tit pics.

---