Current Events > Anyone that is good with economics or math, can you help me out?

Topic List
Page List: 1
clyde_frog
02/06/20 5:03:52 AM
#1:


... Copied to Clipboard!
PrettyBoyFloyd
02/06/20 5:11:52 AM
#2:


How come that's not written up in a sane kind of way ?

---
The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT
[Government Destabilizing Branch]
... Copied to Clipboard!
clyde_frog
02/06/20 5:13:11 AM
#3:


PrettyBoyFloyd posted...
How come that's not written up in a sane kind of way ?

Be a little more specific if you can. Are you referring to the question or the answer?

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
clyde_frog
02/06/20 5:25:18 AM
#5:


While this topic is still up, can anyone take a stab at this? The answer is B)



---
... Copied to Clipboard!
clyde_frog
02/06/20 5:46:15 AM
#6:


... Copied to Clipboard!
Zano
02/06/20 6:39:33 AM
#7:


1) I think this question is written in the most confusing way possible.

2) that exponent of 1/2 on the y is the same as saying the square root of y

3) I believe the problem should be done like below

1.03/sqrt(1.04) = 1.00999 1.01

1.01 is the result if you round the answer, which is the same as 1% growth so the answer is b

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Eviora
02/06/20 6:42:16 AM
#8:


Unless "growth rate" has a very specific meaning in this context, this problem is not written in a mathematically coherent way. How are x and y growing? Linearly? Exponentially? Some other way? Depending on the answer, g(z) may not even be a constant.

Edit: FWIW I think the growth rate is intended to be exponential. So the growth rate of the numerator is 0.03 and the growth rate of the denominator is 0.04*(1/2) = 0.02. (The 1/2 represents the square root written as an exponent.) Therefore, g(z) = exponent of numerator - exponent of denominator = 0.03 - 0.02 = 0.01.

Whoever wrote this question is bad at their job.

---
Cunning, cruel, and cuddly. ||| 3DS Friend Code: 2449-5292-9560 IGN: Amy
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1