Current Events > I humans evolved from apes, why are there still apes?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:19:10 PM #153:	McgeesAlice808 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur. I got a single tourist cave that has nothing to do with dinosaurs. That's not a ton of evidence. The bible isn't evidence. The drawings in that cave are about mammals (iow dinosaurs). How is the bible not evidence? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914742263] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur.</quote> I got a single tourist cave that has nothing to do with dinosaurs. That's not a ton of evidence. The bible isn't evidence.</quote> The drawings in that cave are about mammals (iow dinosaurs). How is the bible not evidence?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/26/18 5:20:04 PM #154:	PokemonExpert44 posted... What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes? As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:914742306] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes?</quote> As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:21:33 PM #155:	hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes? As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain. not an answer --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914742372] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes?</quote> As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain.</quote> not an answer</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryuko_Chan 12/26/18 5:22:55 PM #156:	ThyCorndog posted... gods not real but apes are real evolution: 1 creationism: 0 owned --- https://i.imgtc.com/LCLKlZX.gif Life Fiber Kamui SENKETSU! <cite>Ryuko_Chan posted [p:914742426] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote>gods not real but apes are real evolution: 1 creationism: 0</quote> owned</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metua 12/26/18 5:23:35 PM #157:	PokemonExpert44 posted... mammals (iow dinosaurs). fucking what --- https://imgur.com/yKMR7 https://imgur.com/Xd4gmmR <cite>Metua posted [p:914742450] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>mammals (iow dinosaurs).</quote> fucking what</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:25:09 PM #158:	Metua posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... mammals (iow dinosaurs). fucking what ????? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914742523] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Metua posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>mammals (iow dinosaurs).</quote> fucking what</quote> ?????</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/26/18 5:26:17 PM #159:	PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes? As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain. not an answer I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:914742576] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes?</quote> As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain.</quote> not an answer</quote> I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 5:26:39 PM #160:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914742585] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php</quote> That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:27:20 PM #161:	hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes? As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain. not an answer I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science. you told me nothing that I already know --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914742613] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes?</quote> As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain.</quote> not an answer</quote> I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science.</quote> you told me nothing that I already know</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:29:10 PM #162:	Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling. How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914742692] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php</quote> That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling.</quote> How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pogo_Marimo 12/26/18 5:33:07 PM #163:	McgeesAlice808 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur. I got a single tourist cave that has nothing to do with dinosaurs. That's not a ton of evidence. The bible isn't evidence. I found a site that is pushing the idea that one of the natural rock formations is actually a dinosaur engraving. http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/bernifal.html Never mind the fact that the actual lines of the "engraving" don't look like the engraving lines from all the other actual carvings. Also the rantings of the "author" of these photos sounds at times absolutely paranoid. He talks about being chased out of the cave by a farmer because of some big science conspiracy when the people.... Were really just trespassing on his property and he wanted them to leave. The author makes the drive home sound like they were being followed by the Illuminati. It's all pretty cringe-y. --- So I'm (not real) and I won't call you _//\|-\|\\_ And I want to talk about mature themes \|\|\|daily\|\|\| -> http://www.last.fm/user/Pogo92 \//\|'\|\\/ <cite>Pogo_Marimo posted [p:914742858] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>McgeesAlice808 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur.</quote> I got a single tourist cave that has nothing to do with dinosaurs. That's not a ton of evidence. The bible isn't evidence.</quote> I found a site that is pushing the idea that one of the natural rock formations is actually a dinosaur engraving. http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/bernifal.html Never mind the fact that the actual lines of the "engraving" don't look like the engraving lines from all the other actual carvings. Also the rantings of the "author" of these photos sounds at times absolutely paranoid. He talks about being chased out of the cave by a farmer because of some big science conspiracy when the people.... Were really just trespassing on his property and he wanted them to leave. The author makes the drive home sound like they were being followed by the Illuminati. It's all pretty cringe-y.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/26/18 5:35:36 PM #164:	PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes? As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain. not an answer I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science. you told me nothing that I already know Yes. Because you know nothing. You said the theories of evolution are unscientific. Go ahead and point out where evolutionary science is skipping the whole science part and passing off hunches as law. Which steps are they skipping? Stop confusing "I disagree with a conclusion" with "They arrived there unscientifically." --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:914742966] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes?</quote> As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain.</quote> not an answer</quote> I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science.</quote> you told me nothing that I already know</quote> Yes. Because you know nothing. You said the theories of evolution are unscientific. Go ahead and point out where evolutionary science is skipping the whole science part and passing off hunches as law. Which steps are they skipping? Stop confusing "I disagree with a conclusion" with "They arrived there unscientifically."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:38:43 PM #165:	hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes? As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain. not an answer I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science. you told me nothing that I already know Yes. Because you know nothing. You said the theories of evolution are unscientific. Go ahead and point out where evolutionary science is skipping the whole science part and passing off hunches as law. Which steps are they skipping? Stop confusing "I disagree with a conclusion" with "They arrived there unscientifically." I know nothing, eh? Which fossils clearly show the link between humans and apes? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914743117] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes?</quote> As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain.</quote> not an answer</quote> I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science.</quote> you told me nothing that I already know</quote> Yes. Because you know nothing. You said the theories of evolution are unscientific. Go ahead and point out where evolutionary science is skipping the whole science part and passing off hunches as law. Which steps are they skipping? Stop confusing "I disagree with a conclusion" with "They arrived there unscientifically."</quote> I know nothing, eh? Which fossils clearly show the link between humans and apes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#166	Post #166 was unavailable or deleted.
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 5:40:49 PM #167:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling. How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too. The claim that mutations can't generate information has been debunked for awhile https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13673-evolution-myths-mutations-can-only-destroy-information/ The entirety of that site is just outdated. Darwin's studies were corroborated by future scientists who all peer reviewed their findings which is why evolution is an accepted theory among any educated individuals. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914743201] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php</quote> That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling.</quote> How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too.</quote> The claim that mutations can't generate information has been debunked for awhile https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13673-evolution-myths-mutations-can-only-destroy-information/ The entirety of that site is just outdated. Darwin's studies were corroborated by future scientists who all peer reviewed their findings which is why evolution is an accepted theory among any educated individuals.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:44:01 PM #168:	Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling. How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too. The claim that mutations can't generate information has been debunked for awhile https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13673-evolution-myths-mutations-can-only-destroy-information/ The entirety of that site is just outdated. Darwin's studies were corroborated by future scientists who all peer reviewed their findings which is why evolution is an accepted theory among any educated individuals. No. That link doesn't answer anything. My site is nowhere near being outdated. Also, why do you think Darwin had any original studies when it looks like he plagiarized ideas from Edward Blyth? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914743341] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php</quote> That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling.</quote> How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too.</quote> The claim that mutations can't generate information has been debunked for awhile https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13673-evolution-myths-mutations-can-only-destroy-information/ The entirety of that site is just outdated. Darwin's studies were corroborated by future scientists who all peer reviewed their findings which is why evolution is an accepted theory among any educated individuals.</quote> No. That link doesn't answer anything. My site is nowhere near being outdated. Also, why do you think Darwin had any original studies when it looks like he plagiarized ideas from Edward Blyth?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 5:49:57 PM #169:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling. How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too. The claim that mutations can't generate information has been debunked for awhile https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13673-evolution-myths-mutations-can-only-destroy-information/ The entirety of that site is just outdated. Darwin's studies were corroborated by future scientists who all peer reviewed their findings which is why evolution is an accepted theory among any educated individuals. No. That link doesn't answer anything. My site is nowhere near being outdated. Also, why do you think Darwin had any original studies when it looks like he plagiarized ideas from Edward Blyth? There you are with your repeated denials again. How doesn't it answer anything? It shows that mutations can generate information through both evidence and logic and one of the basis of your shitty site's hypothesis was that mutations can't generation information. And you're nuts if you actually believe your site doesn't look straight out of some barren blog page from 2000. Your site is the one that doesn't answer anything. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914743593] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php</quote> That non peer reviewed article was done in the 2000s with outdated and faulty science. It's also done on a site that was specifically meant to push that narrative which usually aren't trustworthy. Give me an reputable study that was peer reviewed. Though given that you're actually arguing that humans walked beside dinosaurs I can tell you're just trolling.</quote> How is it outdated and faulty science? I own that site. Darwin was never peer-reviewed, too.</quote> The claim that mutations can't generate information has been debunked for awhile https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13673-evolution-myths-mutations-can-only-destroy-information/ The entirety of that site is just outdated. Darwin's studies were corroborated by future scientists who all peer reviewed their findings which is why evolution is an accepted theory among any educated individuals.</quote> No. That link doesn't answer anything. My site is nowhere near being outdated. Also, why do you think Darwin had any original studies when it looks like he plagiarized ideas from Edward Blyth?</quote> There you are with your repeated denials again. How doesn't it answer anything? It shows that mutations can generate information through both evidence and logic and one of the basis of your shitty site's hypothesis was that mutations can't generation information. And you're nuts if you actually believe your site doesn't look straight out of some barren blog page from 2000. Your site is the one that doesn't answer anything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/26/18 5:54:28 PM #170:	PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes? As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain. not an answer I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science. you told me nothing that I already know Yes. Because you know nothing. You said the theories of evolution are unscientific. Go ahead and point out where evolutionary science is skipping the whole science part and passing off hunches as law. Which steps are they skipping? Stop confusing "I disagree with a conclusion" with "They arrived there unscientifically." I know nothing, eh? Which fossils clearly show the link between humans and apes? You're still not understanding what science even is. You're more than welcome to read things on the Internet and see how scientists made observations came up with a hypothesis to test, and drew conclusions based on what they learned via those tests. I am not trying to prove any evolutionary theory as irrefutable law to you, just that things scientists are conducting science. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:914743783] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes?</quote> As soon as your elementary school teaches you what that means and holds your first science fair, I'll try to explain.</quote> not an answer</quote> I already told you. The Scientific Method is the method they use to make and test their claims. What anyone believes or what may ultimately be true eons from now is irrelevant to whether a something is being studied via science.</quote> you told me nothing that I already know</quote> Yes. Because you know nothing. You said the theories of evolution are unscientific. Go ahead and point out where evolutionary science is skipping the whole science part and passing off hunches as law. Which steps are they skipping? Stop confusing "I disagree with a conclusion" with "They arrived there unscientifically."</quote> I know nothing, eh? Which fossils clearly show the link between humans and apes?</quote> You're still not understanding what science even is. You're more than welcome to read things on the Internet and see how scientists made observations came up with a hypothesis to test, and drew conclusions based on what they learned via those tests. I am not trying to prove any evolutionary theory as irrefutable law to you, just that things scientists are conducting science.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
clearaflagrantj 12/26/18 10:17:00 PM #171:	PokemonExpert44 posted... clearaflagrantj posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Also, I'm not FlashOfLight. What did you go to school for though Why? I'm curious <cite>clearaflagrantj posted [p:914754420] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>clearaflagrantj posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Also, I'm not FlashOfLight.</quote> What did you go to school for though</quote> Why?</quote> I'm curious</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 12/26/18 10:51:38 PM #172:	clearaflagrantj posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... clearaflagrantj posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Also, I'm not FlashOfLight. What did you go to school for though Why? I'm curious He might have gone to some deep south bible belt creationist school where they teach christianity instead of math and science. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:914755976] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>clearaflagrantj posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>clearaflagrantj posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote> Also, I'm not FlashOfLight. </quote> What did you go to school for though </quote> Why?</quote> I'm curious</quote> He might have gone to some deep south bible belt creationist school where they teach christianity instead of math and science.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 12/26/18 11:08:17 PM #173:	Rika_Furude posted... clearaflagrantj posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... clearaflagrantj posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Also, I'm not FlashOfLight. What did you go to school for though Why? I'm curious He might have gone to some deep south bible belt creationist school where they teach christianity instead of math and science. does Carpentry count as an elective or is it a requirement to graduate? --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:914756685] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>clearaflagrantj posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>clearaflagrantj posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote> Also, I'm not FlashOfLight. </quote> What did you go to school for though </quote> Why? </quote> I'm curious</quote> He might have gone to some deep south bible belt creationist school where they teach christianity instead of math and science.</quote> does Carpentry count as an elective or is it a requirement to graduate?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Atralis 12/26/18 11:26:09 PM #174:	Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes? <cite>Atralis posted [p:914757352] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 12/26/18 11:32:47 PM #175:	Atralis posted... Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes? Put a caveman in a jungle with one and they can probably make a spear to kill the tiger before the tiger hunts down the caveman --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:914757625] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Atralis posted...</cite> <quote>Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes?</quote> Put a caveman in a jungle with one and they can probably make a spear to kill the tiger before the tiger hunts down the caveman</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tupacrulez 12/27/18 2:01:07 AM #176:	PokemonExpert44 posted... How is the bible not evidence? How is Detective comics#38 not proof of Batman existing? --- Suck less, Rock Moar Have I licked butt hole before? All the time. --r4xor <cite>Tupacrulez posted [p:914762407] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>How is the bible not evidence?</quote> How is Detective comics#38 not proof of Batman existing?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tupacrulez 12/27/18 2:02:10 AM #177:	Rika_Furude posted... Atralis posted... Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes? Put a caveman in a jungle with one and they can probably make a spear to kill the tiger before the tiger hunts down the caveman In a HUGE myriad of plausibilities, no. The lone caveman loosesevery time. --- Suck less, Rock Moar Have I licked butt hole before? All the time. --r4xor <cite>Tupacrulez posted [p:914762427] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Atralis posted...</cite> <quote>Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes?</quote> Put a caveman in a jungle with one and they can probably make a spear to kill the tiger before the tiger hunts down the caveman</quote> In a HUGE myriad of plausibilities, no. The lone caveman loosesevery time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rikasa 12/27/18 2:13:51 AM #178:	Well, our ability to use tools is why we're apex predators like the tiger. We both have really amazing and different strengths --- you are not alone <cite>rikasa posted [p:914762709] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Well, our ability to use tools is why we're apex predators like the tiger. We both have really amazing and different strengths</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 12/27/18 2:19:15 AM #179:	Atralis posted... Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes? how would tilting the playing field itself in the tiger's favor somehow proof of evolution on either side? a human being is physically inferior to many things. but our intelligence is why tigers aren't the ones doing the taming. we literally build. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:914762821] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Atralis posted...</cite> <quote> Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes?</quote> how would tilting the playing field itself in the tiger's favor somehow proof of evolution on either side? a human being is physically inferior to many things. but our intelligence is why tigers aren't the ones doing the taming. we literally build.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tupacrulez 12/27/18 1:43:14 PM #180:	rikasa posted... Well, our ability to use tools is why we're apex predators like the tiger. We both have really amazing and different strengths RickyTheBAWSE posted... Atralis posted... Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes? how would tilting the playing field itself in the tiger's favor somehow proof of evolution on either side? a human being is physically inferior to many things. but our intelligence is why tigers aren't the ones doing the taming. we literally build. The human ability to reproduce at an exponential rate, coupled with our innate sense of community is why we are the dominant species. We make babies fast, and we stay in groups. --- Suck less, Rock Moar Have I licked butt hole before? All the time. --r4xor <cite>Tupacrulez posted [p:914780449] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>rikasa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, our ability to use tools is why we're apex predators like the tiger. We both have really amazing and different strengths</quote> <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Atralis posted...</cite> <quote> Honest answer? Think of evolution as a tangling mess of weeds rather than a staircase with discrete step. Are you more evolved than a tiger? If I put you in a cage with one would you still say yes?</quote> how would tilting the playing field itself in the tiger's favor somehow proof of evolution on either side? a human being is physically inferior to many things. but our intelligence is why tigers aren't the ones doing the taming. we literally build.</quote> The human ability to reproduce at an exponential rate, coupled with our innate sense of community is why we are the dominant species. We make babies fast, and we stay in groups.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
C_Pain 12/27/18 1:44:18 PM #181:	imagine fucking imagine posting in this joke topic --- How quaint. Join the Dank Chamber today: https://discord.gg/YwmDmtZ <cite>C_Pain posted [p:914780494] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>imagine fucking imagine posting in this joke topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
catboy0_0 12/27/18 1:45:22 PM #182:	don't for get my "Y" branching path analogy! it was a good tip to understand how it all works ;) --- I obviously like you at least a little to even talk to you -cornman one day I hope to post a message so great it ends up in someones sig -Two_Dee <cite>catboy0_0 posted [p:914780538] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>don't for get my "Y" branching path analogy! it was a good tip to understand how it all works ;)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#183	Post #183 was unavailable or deleted.
SableWolfAngel 12/27/18 2:54:00 PM #184:	Humans have opposable thumbs! --- http://www.backloggery.com/SableWolfAngel https://imgur.com/At3Hcq5 \| https://imgur.com/F1pWSAm <cite>SableWolfAngel posted [p:914783711] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Humans have opposable thumbs!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 12/27/18 8:34:17 PM #185:	PokemonExpert44 posted... How is the bible not evidence? --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:914799061] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>How is the bible not evidence?</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 12/27/18 8:39:34 PM #186:	DrizztLink posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... How is the bible not evidence? hey man, god can edit and rewrite his book all he wants --- Hey what's going on in this thread https://imgur.com/6fpKRW8 https://imgur.com/RNZi0gk <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:914799274] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>DrizztLink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>How is the bible not evidence?</quote> </quote> hey man, god can edit and rewrite his book all he wants</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > I humans evolved from apes, why are there still apes? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > I humans evolved from apes, why are there still apes?