Current Events > I humans evolved from apes, why are there still apes?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
ThyCorndog 12/26/18 10:14:09 AM #103:	Pogo_Marimo posted... itachi15243 posted... Why do people even ask this. If every species we evolved from lived there would be like 10-20 ape-human/devolved hypes of humans. Big foot would probably be real though Yeah. Lot of hominids failed as evolutionary branches until Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens came along. Then Neanderthals largely failed save the small amount of interbreeding with Homo Sapiens. denisovans also mixed with homo sapiens out in australasia and now there's another that's been possibly been discovered that sub saharan african humans mixed with --- Hey what's going on in this thread https://imgur.com/6fpKRW8 https://imgur.com/RNZi0gk <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:914725883] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>itachi15243 posted...</cite> <quote>Why do people even ask this. If every species we evolved from lived there would be like 10-20 ape-human/devolved hypes of humans. Big foot would probably be real though</quote> Yeah. Lot of hominids failed as evolutionary branches until Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens came along. Then Neanderthals largely failed save the small amount of interbreeding with Homo Sapiens.</quote> denisovans also mixed with homo sapiens out in australasia and now there's another that's been possibly been discovered that sub saharan african humans mixed with</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#104	Post #104 was unavailable or deleted.
Pogo_Marimo 12/26/18 11:16:44 AM #105:	ThyCorndog posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... itachi15243 posted... Why do people even ask this. If every species we evolved from lived there would be like 10-20 ape-human/devolved hypes of humans. Big foot would probably be real though Yeah. Lot of hominids failed as evolutionary branches until Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens came along. Then Neanderthals largely failed save the small amount of interbreeding with Homo Sapiens. denisovans also mixed with homo sapiens out in australasia and now there's another that's been possibly been discovered that sub saharan african humans mixed with This is new to me, therefore it's not true and you have no idea what you're talking about. I am right. Nah just kidding, I'll have to look that up as it sounds pretty interesting. --- So I'm (not real) and I won't call you _//\|-\|\\_ And I want to talk about mature themes \|\|\|daily\|\|\| -> http://www.last.fm/user/Pogo92 \//\|'\|\\/ <cite>Pogo_Marimo posted [p:914727695] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>itachi15243 posted...</cite> <quote>Why do people even ask this. If every species we evolved from lived there would be like 10-20 ape-human/devolved hypes of humans. Big foot would probably be real though</quote> Yeah. Lot of hominids failed as evolutionary branches until Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens came along. Then Neanderthals largely failed save the small amount of interbreeding with Homo Sapiens.</quote> denisovans also mixed with homo sapiens out in australasia and now there's another that's been possibly been discovered that sub saharan african humans mixed with</quote> This is new to me, therefore it's not true and you have no idea what you're talking about. I am right. Nah just kidding, I'll have to look that up as it sounds pretty interesting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 12:39:06 PM #106:	Pogo_Marimo posted... Flintgrandad posted... I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude. I miss him. :( Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914730603] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote>I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude.</quote> I miss him. :(</quote> Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 3:09:21 PM #107:	Flintgrandad posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... Flintgrandad posted... I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude. I miss him. :( Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44. I'm not unintelligent. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914736702] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote>I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude.</quote> I miss him. :(</quote> Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44.</quote> I'm not unintelligent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 3:10:58 PM #108:	Also, I'm not FlashOfLight. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914736781] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Also, I'm not FlashOfLight.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
clearaflagrantj 12/26/18 3:14:17 PM #109:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Also, I'm not FlashOfLight. What did you go to school for though <cite>clearaflagrantj posted [p:914736969] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Also, I'm not FlashOfLight.</quote> What did you go to school for though</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 3:16:10 PM #110:	clearaflagrantj posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Also, I'm not FlashOfLight. What did you go to school for though Why? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914737053] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>clearaflagrantj posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Also, I'm not FlashOfLight.</quote> What did you go to school for though</quote> Why?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 3:23:36 PM #111:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... Flintgrandad posted... I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude. I miss him. :( Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44. I'm not unintelligent. Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914737381] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote>I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude.</quote> I miss him. :(</quote> Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44.</quote> I'm not unintelligent.</quote> Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 3:26:55 PM #112:	Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... Flintgrandad posted... I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude. I miss him. :( Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44. I'm not unintelligent. Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are. Okay. How am I dumb? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914737511] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote>I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude.</quote> I miss him. :(</quote> Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44.</quote> I'm not unintelligent.</quote> Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are.</quote> Okay. How am I dumb?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 3:28:20 PM #113:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... Flintgrandad posted... I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude. I miss him. :( Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44. I'm not unintelligent. Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are. Okay. How am I dumb? It's been explained to you countless times by others but an idiot will never understand how they're an idiot. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914737585] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote>I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude.</quote> I miss him. :(</quote> Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44.</quote> I'm not unintelligent.</quote> Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are.</quote> Okay. How am I dumb?</quote> It's been explained to you countless times by others but an idiot will never understand how they're an idiot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 3:30:36 PM #114:	Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... Flintgrandad posted... I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude. I miss him. :( Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44. I'm not unintelligent. Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are. Okay. How am I dumb? It's been explained to you countless times by others but an idiot will never understand how they're an idiot. Nice deflection. I am not an idiot. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914737686] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote>I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude.</quote> I miss him. :(</quote> Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44.</quote> I'm not unintelligent.</quote> Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are.</quote> Okay. How am I dumb?</quote> It's been explained to you countless times by others but an idiot will never understand how they're an idiot.</quote> Nice deflection. I am not an idiot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pogo_Marimo 12/26/18 3:31:43 PM #115:	Flintgrandad posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... Flintgrandad posted... I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude. I miss him. :( Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44. He was at least passionate and earnest about his beliefs. Half the times you argue with a troll on here and you feel like they've got one foot in the debate and the other foot out the door. --- So I'm (not real) and I won't call you _//\|-\|\\_ And I want to talk about mature themes \|\|\|daily\|\|\| -> http://www.last.fm/user/Pogo92 \//\|'\|\\/ <cite>Pogo_Marimo posted [p:914737735] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote>I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude.</quote> I miss him. :(</quote> Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44.</quote> He was at least passionate and earnest about his beliefs. Half the times you argue with a troll on here and you feel like they've got one foot in the debate and the other foot out the door.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TommyVercetti 12/26/18 3:32:19 PM #116:	HylianFox posted... Their very existence is insulting to us. tc you're a creationist? <cite>TommyVercetti posted [p:914737760] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>HylianFox posted...</cite> <quote>Their very existence is insulting to us.</quote> tc you're a creationist?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 3:35:14 PM #117:	Pogo_Marimo posted... Flintgrandad posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... Flintgrandad posted... I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude. I miss him. :( Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44. He was at least passionate and earnest about his beliefs. Half the times you argue with a troll on here and you feel like they've got one foot in the debate and the other foot out the door. I'm not a troll. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914737898] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote>I think PE44 might be that FlashOfLight creationist dude.</quote> I miss him. :(</quote> Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44.</quote> He was at least passionate and earnest about his beliefs. Half the times you argue with a troll on here and you feel like they've got one foot in the debate and the other foot out the door.</quote> I'm not a troll.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 3:35:22 PM #118:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44. I'm not unintelligent. Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are. Okay. How am I dumb? It's been explained to you countless times by others but an idiot will never understand how they're an idiot. Nice deflection. I am not an idiot. That's not up for you to decide. Your posts are ones of an idiot's so you're presenting yourself as one if you really aren't (doubtful though) Pogo_Marimo posted... He was at least passionate and earnest about his beliefs. Half the times you argue with a troll on here and you feel like they've got one foot in the debate and the other foot out the door. He uses the same kind of logical fallacies and intellectual dishonesty. FoL never yielded once in his many months of arguments while someone who's genuinely interested in debating would at least once or twice concede a point. And to me actually being genuinely dense and illogical does irk me a bit more than someone who's obviously just trying to look stupid for fun. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914737908] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote> Why? He was an unintelligent syncophant just like PE44.</quote> I'm not unintelligent.</quote> Oh you're a lot more than that but that is indeed one of the things you are.</quote> Okay. How am I dumb?</quote> It's been explained to you countless times by others but an idiot will never understand how they're an idiot.</quote> Nice deflection. I am not an idiot.</quote> That's not up for you to decide. Your posts are ones of an idiot's so you're presenting yourself as one if you really aren't (doubtful though) <cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote> He was at least passionate and earnest about his beliefs. Half the times you argue with a troll on here and you feel like they've got one foot in the debate and the other foot out the door.</quote> He uses the same kind of logical fallacies and intellectual dishonesty. FoL never yielded once in his many months of arguments while someone who's genuinely interested in debating would at least once or twice concede a point. And to me actually being genuinely dense and illogical does irk me a bit more than someone who's obviously just trying to look stupid for fun.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 3:40:24 PM #119:	Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914738138] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 3:45:08 PM #120:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error. All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. Also the "umad" response typical of a troll. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914738335] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error.</quote> All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. Also the "umad" response typical of a troll.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 3:50:41 PM #121:	Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error. All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. I'm not arguing like an idiot, though. I have provided many reasons for my beliefs in this topic and I will continue to do so. My posts have not been completely against science and biology. The way you say this means you didn't take the time to read through my well reasoned posts. I also am not merely saying "Nope not true," I am also providing reasons and arguments that you haven't properly countered yet in this topic. You say this: 'If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not an ad hominem to point out that they are." That seems contradictory to say that, when you deny something as formal as a blatant fallacy; it is an hom in the end. How are my arguments not genuine? I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something, much less great apes or from any hypothetical common ancestor that has not even been proved to exist in the first place. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914738593] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error.</quote> All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic.</quote> I'm not arguing like an idiot, though. I have provided many reasons for my beliefs in this topic and I will continue to do so. My posts have not been completely against science and biology. The way you say this means you didn't take the time to read through my well reasoned posts. I also am not merely saying "Nope not true," I am also providing reasons and arguments that you haven't properly countered yet in this topic. You say this: 'If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not an ad hominem to point out that they are." That seems contradictory to say that, when you deny something as formal as a blatant fallacy; it is an hom in the end. How are my arguments not genuine? I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something, much less great apes or from any hypothetical common ancestor that has not even been proved to exist in the first place.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Firewerx 12/26/18 3:58:10 PM #122:	PokemonExpert44 posted... I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something What kind of proof would you consider persuasive that we evolved from something? --- texty bastard <cite>Firewerx posted [p:914738909] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something</quote> What kind of proof would you consider persuasive that we evolved from something?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 3:59:23 PM #123:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error. All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. I'm not arguing like an idiot, though. I have provided many reasons for my beliefs in this topic and I will continue to do so. My posts have not been completely against science and biology. The way you say this means you didn't take the time to read through my well reasoned posts. I also am not merely saying "Nope not true," I am also providing reasons and arguments that you haven't properly countered yet in this topic. You say this: 'If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not an ad hominem to point out that they are." That seems contradictory to say that, when you deny something as formal as a blatant fallacy; it is an hom in the end. How are my arguments not genuine? I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something, much less great apes or from any hypothetical common ancestor that has not even been proved to exist in the first place. Show me a post you've made in this topic that was a genuine argument with logical reasoning. The only posts you've made on the entire front page was you going "nope, not true, that's not evidence" despite peer consensus with pretty much every scientist is that it is and "if we're apes how come babies don't like apes" which is troll responses made to make fun of how stupid people who are anti-evolution are. And ad hominem is reserved for genuine discussion. Something you haven't been doing. If someone insists the sky is purple with no evidence then it's not ad hominem to say they have eye issues or are delusional. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914738969] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error.</quote> All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic.</quote> I'm not arguing like an idiot, though. I have provided many reasons for my beliefs in this topic and I will continue to do so. My posts have not been completely against science and biology. The way you say this means you didn't take the time to read through my well reasoned posts. I also am not merely saying "Nope not true," I am also providing reasons and arguments that you haven't properly countered yet in this topic. You say this: 'If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not an ad hominem to point out that they are." That seems contradictory to say that, when you deny something as formal as a blatant fallacy; it is an hom in the end. How are my arguments not genuine? I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something, much less great apes or from any hypothetical common ancestor that has not even been proved to exist in the first place.</quote> Show me a post you've made in this topic that was a genuine argument with logical reasoning. The only posts you've made on the entire front page was you going "nope, not true, that's not evidence" despite peer consensus with pretty much every scientist is that it is and "if we're apes how come babies don't like apes" which is troll responses made to make fun of how stupid people who are anti-evolution are. And ad hominem is reserved for genuine discussion. Something you haven't been doing. If someone insists the sky is purple with no evidence then it's not ad hominem to say they have eye issues or are delusional.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gatorsPENSbucs 12/26/18 4:02:53 PM #124:	Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error. All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. Also the "umad" response typical of a troll. And you're doing the same thing as that guy. Y'all both haven't done shit in this topic except for you deflecting Pokemons questions. --- https://i.imgtc.com/qhHzPXC.jpg https://imgur.com/pqMQZyw <cite>gatorsPENSbucs posted [p:914739136] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error.</quote> All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. Also the "umad" response typical of a troll.</quote> And you're doing the same thing as that guy. Y'all both haven't done shit in this topic except for you deflecting Pokemons questions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 12/26/18 4:04:01 PM #125:	Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:914739176] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 4:05:25 PM #126:	Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error. All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. I'm not arguing like an idiot, though. I have provided many reasons for my beliefs in this topic and I will continue to do so. My posts have not been completely against science and biology. The way you say this means you didn't take the time to read through my well reasoned posts. I also am not merely saying "Nope not true," I am also providing reasons and arguments that you haven't properly countered yet in this topic. You say this: 'If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not an ad hominem to point out that they are." That seems contradictory to say that, when you deny something as formal as a blatant fallacy; it is an hom in the end. How are my arguments not genuine? I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something, much less great apes or from any hypothetical common ancestor that has not even been proved to exist in the first place. Show me a post you've made in this topic that was a genuine argument with logical reasoning. The only posts you've made on the entire front page was you going "nope, not true, that's not evidence" despite peer consensus with pretty much every scientist is that it is and "if we're apes how come babies don't like apes" which is troll responses made to make fun of how stupid people who are anti-evolution are. And ad hominem is reserved for genuine discussion. Something you haven't been doing. If someone insists the sky is purple with no evidence then it's not ad hominem to say they have eye issues or are delusional. 1. Every post in this topic that is made by me has been nothing but genuine. 2. Peer Consensus? Which peers say would you think they say? 3. Not every scientist alive today agrees with you. 4. If we really came from apes, and are apes, then you'd need to show how we are apes when little babies are born. Human babies look nothing like baby apes. Do you think human babies look like apes when they're born? 4. Me asking serious questions and typing out reasoned posts like the ones I have made ITT are not trolling posts; they're genuine. 5. I HAVE been genuine. 5. You deny using ad hominem against me in any of your extremely stupid posts itt. You have used many ad hominems against me in this topic here and don't do a good job of hiding that fact. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914739240] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error.</quote> All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic.</quote> I'm not arguing like an idiot, though. I have provided many reasons for my beliefs in this topic and I will continue to do so. My posts have not been completely against science and biology. The way you say this means you didn't take the time to read through my well reasoned posts. I also am not merely saying "Nope not true," I am also providing reasons and arguments that you haven't properly countered yet in this topic. You say this: 'If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not an ad hominem to point out that they are." That seems contradictory to say that, when you deny something as formal as a blatant fallacy; it is an hom in the end. How are my arguments not genuine? I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something, much less great apes or from any hypothetical common ancestor that has not even been proved to exist in the first place.</quote> Show me a post you've made in this topic that was a genuine argument with logical reasoning. The only posts you've made on the entire front page was you going "nope, not true, that's not evidence" despite peer consensus with pretty much every scientist is that it is and "if we're apes how come babies don't like apes" which is troll responses made to make fun of how stupid people who are anti-evolution are. And ad hominem is reserved for genuine discussion. Something you haven't been doing. If someone insists the sky is purple with no evidence then it's not ad hominem to say they have eye issues or are delusional.</quote> 1. Every post in this topic that is made by me has been nothing but genuine. 2. Peer Consensus? Which peers say would you think they say? 3. Not every scientist alive today agrees with you. 4. If we really came from apes, and are apes, then you'd need to show how we are apes when little babies are born. Human babies look nothing like baby apes. Do you think human babies look like apes when they're born? 4. Me asking serious questions and typing out reasoned posts like the ones I have made ITT are not trolling posts; they're genuine. 5. I HAVE been genuine. 5. You deny using ad hominem against me in any of your extremely stupid posts itt. You have used many ad hominems against me in this topic here and don't do a good job of hiding that fact.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 4:06:15 PM #127:	Rika_Furude posted... Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. How is evolution science? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914739274] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll.</quote> How is evolution science?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 4:07:36 PM #128:	gatorsPENSbucs posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error. All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. Also the "umad" response typical of a troll. And you're doing the same thing as that guy. Y'all both haven't done shit in this topic except for you deflecting Pokemons questions. Multiple scientific sources have already been posted ITT which he's deflected as "not enough evidence". And it should be pretty much common sense at this point anyway. Are you a creationist too? I've always pinned you as liking to conservatroll but I didn't know you were creationist level. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914739343] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>gatorsPENSbucs posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Flintgrandad: Yes, it is. If I'm not an idiot, it's up to me to show you that I'm not. My posts have always been on point with science and everyone ITT has not countered any of my posts with scientific fact. You, on the other hand, see fit to call me names because you cant counter my posts properly, or even commented on because you enjoy using ad hominems. LOL. It seems that you get severly butthurt when your pet theory of evolution gets criticized and or shown to be in serious error.</quote> All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. Also the "umad" response typical of a troll.</quote> And you're doing the same thing as that guy. Y'all both haven't done shit in this topic except for you deflecting Pokemons questions.</quote> Multiple scientific sources have already been posted ITT which he's deflected as "not enough evidence". And it should be pretty much common sense at this point anyway. Are you a creationist too? I've always pinned you as liking to conservatroll but I didn't know you were creationist level.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 4:17:26 PM #129:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad posted... All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic. I'm not arguing like an idiot, though. I have provided many reasons for my beliefs in this topic and I will continue to do so. My posts have not been completely against science and biology. The way you say this means you didn't take the time to read through my well reasoned posts. I also am not merely saying "Nope not true," I am also providing reasons and arguments that you haven't properly countered yet in this topic. You say this: 'If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not an ad hominem to point out that they are." That seems contradictory to say that, when you deny something as formal as a blatant fallacy; it is an hom in the end. How are my arguments not genuine? I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something, much less great apes or from any hypothetical common ancestor that has not even been proved to exist in the first place. Show me a post you've made in this topic that was a genuine argument with logical reasoning. The only posts you've made on the entire front page was you going "nope, not true, that's not evidence" despite peer consensus with pretty much every scientist is that it is and "if we're apes how come babies don't like apes" which is troll responses made to make fun of how stupid people who are anti-evolution are. And ad hominem is reserved for genuine discussion. Something you haven't been doing. If someone insists the sky is purple with no evidence then it's not ad hominem to say they have eye issues or are delusional. 1. Every post in this topic that is made by me has been nothing but genuine. 2. Peer Consensus? Which peers say would you think they say? 3. Not every scientist alive today agrees with you. 4. If we really came from apes, and are apes, then you'd need to show how we are apes when little babies are born. Human babies look nothing like baby apes. Do you think human babies look like apes when they're born? 4. Me asking serious questions and typing out reasoned posts like the ones I have made ITT are not trolling posts; they're genuine. 5. I HAVE been genuine. 5. You deny using ad hominem against me in any of your extremely stupid posts itt. You have used many ad hominems against me in this topic here and don't do a good job of hiding that fact. Repeating "nope" and "not enough evidence for me" isn't a genuine discussion. It's an idiot's denial. Give me a source of reputable scientists that deny evolution, I'll wait. #4 is elementary science. Evolution takes place over hundreds of thousands of years. You have a basic lack of knowledge on what evolution is. The fact that you're making arguments that are used to make fun of how stupid anti-evolution people are means you're either trolling or are actually this stupid. Pointing out how people are behaving is not an ad hominem. <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914739749] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Flintgrandad posted...</cite> <quote> All you're doing is proving my point. Your posts have been completely against science and biology and you've just just been repeating "nope not true" like a child without providing any source of your own. If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not ad hominem to point out that they are. You've not made a single genuine argument in this topic.</quote> I'm not arguing like an idiot, though. I have provided many reasons for my beliefs in this topic and I will continue to do so. My posts have not been completely against science and biology. The way you say this means you didn't take the time to read through my well reasoned posts. I also am not merely saying "Nope not true," I am also providing reasons and arguments that you haven't properly countered yet in this topic. You say this: 'If all someone does is argue like an idiot then it's not an ad hominem to point out that they are." That seems contradictory to say that, when you deny something as formal as a blatant fallacy; it is an hom in the end. How are my arguments not genuine? I have researched a lot of the time in my free time, and no one has shown that we evolved from something, much less great apes or from any hypothetical common ancestor that has not even been proved to exist in the first place.</quote> Show me a post you've made in this topic that was a genuine argument with logical reasoning. The only posts you've made on the entire front page was you going "nope, not true, that's not evidence" despite peer consensus with pretty much every scientist is that it is and "if we're apes how come babies don't like apes" which is troll responses made to make fun of how stupid people who are anti-evolution are. And ad hominem is reserved for genuine discussion. Something you haven't been doing. If someone insists the sky is purple with no evidence then it's not ad hominem to say they have eye issues or are delusional.</quote> 1. Every post in this topic that is made by me has been nothing but genuine. 2. Peer Consensus? Which peers say would you think they say? 3. Not every scientist alive today agrees with you. 4. If we really came from apes, and are apes, then you'd need to show how we are apes when little babies are born. Human babies look nothing like baby apes. Do you think human babies look like apes when they're born? 4. Me asking serious questions and typing out reasoned posts like the ones I have made ITT are not trolling posts; they're genuine. 5. I HAVE been genuine. 5. You deny using ad hominem against me in any of your extremely stupid posts itt. You have used many ad hominems against me in this topic here and don't do a good job of hiding that fact.</quote> Repeating "nope" and "not enough evidence for me" isn't a genuine discussion. It's an idiot's denial. Give me a source of reputable scientists that deny evolution, I'll wait. #4 is elementary science. Evolution takes place over hundreds of thousands of years. You have a basic lack of knowledge on what evolution is. The fact that you're making arguments that are used to make fun of how stupid anti-evolution people are means you're either trolling or are actually this stupid. Pointing out how people are behaving is not an ad hominem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 4:26:34 PM #130:	Flintgrandad: Evolutions takes hundreds of thousands of years? LMAO! You say evolution takes that long for it to work, which means evolution also can't be observed in that time span by anyone actually studying it. I also have said a lot more than just "nope" and "not enough evidence for me," I've provided reasoning that contradict what evolution teaches, and yet you still think evolution is true. I have also a list of people that deny evolution: Lee Spetner William Dembski Stephen C. Meyer Paul Nelson Phil Johnson Ken Ham John Sarfati I am also not anti evolution. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914740139] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Flintgrandad: Evolutions takes hundreds of thousands of years? LMAO! You say evolution takes that long for it to work, which means evolution also can't be observed in that time span by anyone actually studying it. I also have said a lot more than just "nope" and "not enough evidence for me," I've provided reasoning that contradict what evolution teaches, and yet you still think evolution is true. I have also a list of people that deny evolution: Lee Spetner William Dembski Stephen C. Meyer Paul Nelson Phil Johnson Ken Ham John Sarfati I am also not anti evolution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/26/18 4:29:13 PM #131:	If humans evolved from apes, then why are some humans still so stupid? Checkmate, atheists. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:914740235] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>If humans evolved from apes, then why are some humans still so stupid? Checkmate, atheists.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anti-245 12/26/18 4:33:31 PM #132:	I don't know what "I" humans are. --- Life in the DoB. <cite>Anti-245 posted [p:914740385] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>I don't know what "I" humans are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flintgrandad 12/26/18 4:35:00 PM #133:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Flintgrandad: Evolutions takes hundreds of thousands of years? LMAO! You say evolution takes that long for it to work, which means evolution also can't be observed in that time span by anyone actually studying it. I also have said a lot more than just "nope" and "not enough evidence for me," I've provided reasoning that contradict what evolution teaches, and yet you still think evolution is true. I have also a list of people that deny evolution: Lee Spetner William Dembski Stephen C. Meyer Paul Nelson Phil Johnson Ken Ham John Sarfati I am also not anti evolution. It's like I'm talking to a 5 year old. Evolution has been observed through bones and structures of ancient humans throughout the ages. It's an observable phenomenon that different members of different species looked much different thousands of years ago. https://www.livescience.com/474-controversy-evolution-works.html http://www2.mbusd.org/staff/pware/PDFPPT/Darwin.pdf http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150803-how-do-we-know-evolution-is-real https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-05/fm-wmr050818.php And countless scholarly books on the subject. Your "reasoning" is nothing but intellectual dishonesty and ignorance. And give me sources those random names are reputable and what accomplishments they have. Not anti-evolution? You've been denying it's a thing this whole topic. Do you have multiple personalities or something? <cite>Flintgrandad posted [p:914740451] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>Flintgrandad: Evolutions takes hundreds of thousands of years? LMAO! You say evolution takes that long for it to work, which means evolution also can't be observed in that time span by anyone actually studying it. I also have said a lot more than just "nope" and "not enough evidence for me," I've provided reasoning that contradict what evolution teaches, and yet you still think evolution is true. I have also a list of people that deny evolution: Lee Spetner William Dembski Stephen C. Meyer Paul Nelson Phil Johnson Ken Ham John Sarfati I am also not anti evolution.</quote> It's like I'm talking to a 5 year old. Evolution has been observed through bones and structures of ancient humans throughout the ages. It's an observable phenomenon that different members of different species looked much different thousands of years ago. https://www.livescience.com/474-controversy-evolution-works.html http://www2.mbusd.org/staff/pware/PDFPPT/Darwin.pdf http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150803-how-do-we-know-evolution-is-real https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-05/fm-wmr050818.php And countless scholarly books on the subject. Your "reasoning" is nothing but intellectual dishonesty and ignorance. And give me sources those random names are reputable and what accomplishments they have. Not anti-evolution? You've been denying it's a thing this whole topic. Do you have multiple personalities or something?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 12/26/18 4:44:23 PM #134:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. How is evolution science? The same way gravity is. Are you a real person? Do you deny gravity as well? Are you a flat earther and anti-vaxxer? --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:914740830] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote> Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. </quote> How is evolution science?</quote> The same way gravity is. Are you a real person? Do you deny gravity as well? Are you a flat earther and anti-vaxxer?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SubtletyRefuge 12/26/18 4:45:02 PM #135:	PokemonExpert44 posted... FlyingForever posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... TyVulpine posted... YHWH_Saves posted... Bob the Almighty posted... YHWH_Saves posted... I myself have backed out of the "Job 40 = dinosaurs" argument, not because I disagree with it, but rather because I heard a better interpretation (in my opinion). Well I was being a little sarcastic lol. I thought the tone was obvious haha. Haha. No worries. I was addressing dhalsimrocks in his rebuttal. That being said, because I believe that dinosaurs did walk with man (and because after several big museum visits to specifically see dinosaur bones, and being only met with "98% of this T-Rex reconstruction is facsimile, and am skeptical that the darned things even exist...lol), I do believe that Job 40 has the potential to be about dinosaur/dinosaur-like creatures. I think it's actually referencing Satan as the serpent/leviathan who God strung up like a fish, humiliating the one who corrupted the world. But...that it could be invoking legend/actual history to paint this picture. So I don't disagree with your interpretation at all :) Dinosaurs walked with man? Sorry, but there was a 65 million year gap between the last dinosaurs and mankind (proof being none of the plants the herbivore dinosaurs ate were around by the time humans first appeared, plus the oxygen levels in the atmosphere at the time dinosaurs roamed was far less than it is today, and was too low to sustain human life). Ancient man DID walk with dinosaurs. Oh pokemonexpert you never cease to blow my mind. There's a ton of evidence proving that humans walked with dinosaurs. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/263-religion/77296394/914072065 LMAO --- Real subtle <cite>SubtletyRefuge posted [p:914740861] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FlyingForever posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TyVulpine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YHWH_Saves posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bob the Almighty posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YHWH_Saves posted...</cite> <quote>I myself have backed out of the "Job 40 = dinosaurs" argument, not because I disagree with it, but rather because I heard a better interpretation (in my opinion). </quote> Well I was being a little sarcastic lol. I thought the tone was obvious haha.</quote> Haha. No worries. I was addressing dhalsimrocks in his rebuttal. That being said, because I believe that dinosaurs did walk with man (and because after several big museum visits to specifically see dinosaur bones, and being only met with "98% of this T-Rex reconstruction is facsimile, and am skeptical that the darned things even exist...lol), I do believe that Job 40 has the potential to be about dinosaur/dinosaur-like creatures. I think it's actually referencing Satan as the serpent/leviathan who God strung up like a fish, humiliating the one who corrupted the world. But...that it could be invoking legend/actual history to paint this picture. So I don't disagree with your interpretation at all :)</quote> Dinosaurs walked with man? Sorry, but there was a 65 million year gap between the last dinosaurs and mankind (proof being none of the plants the herbivore dinosaurs ate were around by the time humans first appeared, plus the oxygen levels in the atmosphere at the time dinosaurs roamed was far less than it is today, and was too low to sustain human life).</quote> Ancient man DID walk with dinosaurs.</quote> Oh pokemonexpert you never cease to blow my mind.</quote> There's a ton of evidence proving that humans walked with dinosaurs.</quote> https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/263-religion/77296394/914072065 LMAO</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 4:47:04 PM #136:	Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914740943] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Here are some links for you to read at your earliest convenience, from the scientists that I mentioned above: https://www.trueorigin.org/design01.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner2.php</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/26/18 4:47:30 PM #137:	PokemonExpert44 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. How is evolution science? Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:914740964] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll.</quote> How is evolution science?</quote> Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gatorsPENSbucs 12/26/18 4:48:33 PM #138:	So wait, if we did come from apes then why is it such an awful statement to say someone resembles an ape. Maybe it is all fake. --- https://i.imgtc.com/qhHzPXC.jpg https://imgur.com/pqMQZyw <cite>gatorsPENSbucs posted [p:914741013] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>So wait, if we did come from apes then why is it such an awful statement to say someone resembles an ape. Maybe it is all fake.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bad_Mojo 12/26/18 4:48:36 PM #139:	Creature evolved from aligators, yet those are around as well --- https://i.imgtc.com/hQ5SuG6.gif https://i.imgtc.com/QrhAq36.gif https://i.imgtc.com/Yjov9DU.gif <cite>Bad_Mojo posted [p:914741015] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Creature evolved from aligators, yet those are around as well</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KillerKhan420 12/26/18 4:49:31 PM #140:	Neanderthal man is still waiting to make a comeback. I heard they were strong and sometimes swallowed humans whole. Like a buffet. --- "I know how the business works because I'm a wrestling fan"-hulkhogan1 <cite>KillerKhan420 posted [p:914741059] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>Neanderthal man is still waiting to make a comeback. I heard they were strong and sometimes swallowed humans whole. Like a buffet.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 4:50:47 PM #141:	hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. How is evolution science? Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914741111] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll.</quote> How is evolution science?</quote> Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins</quote> There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#142	Post #142 was unavailable or deleted.
hockeybub89 12/26/18 4:56:02 PM #143:	PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. How is evolution science? Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes. I feel like you have no idea what the scientific method is? Even something that could turn out wrong can be built from good science. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:914741320] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll.</quote> How is evolution science?</quote> Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins</quote> There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes.</quote> I feel like you have no idea what the scientific method is? Even something that could turn out wrong can be built from good science.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#144	Post #144 was unavailable or deleted.
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 4:57:39 PM #145:	McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur. --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914741404] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 4:58:23 PM #146:	hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. How is evolution science? Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes. I feel like you have no idea what the scientific method is? Even something that could turn out wrong can be built from good science. What scientific method can be used to try to explain the origins of humans? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914741431] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll.</quote> How is evolution science?</quote> Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins</quote> There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes.</quote> I feel like you have no idea what the scientific method is? Even something that could turn out wrong can be built from good science.</quote> What scientific method can be used to try to explain the origins of humans?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pogo_Marimo 12/26/18 5:00:02 PM #147:	PokemonExpert44 posted... McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur. No results found for Bernaful cave --- So I'm (not real) and I won't call you _//\|-\|\\_ And I want to talk about mature themes \|\|\|daily\|\|\| -> http://www.last.fm/user/Pogo92 \//\|'\|\\/ <cite>Pogo_Marimo posted [p:914741496] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur.</quote> No results found for Bernaful cave</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:01:39 PM #148:	Pogo_Marimo posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur. No results found for Bernaful cave try this link, then: https://archaeology-travel.com/france/bernifal/ --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914741556] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote>McgeesAlice808: Look up on google "Bernaful cave." Also, the behemoth mentioned in the Bible is a dinosaur.</quote> No results found for Bernaful cave</quote> try this link, then: https://archaeology-travel.com/france/bernifal/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rodu_jr 12/26/18 5:05:21 PM #149:	If tc can't wrap his mind around humans are apes, wait till he realizes mammals are descended from reptiles <cite>rodu_jr posted [p:914741689] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote>If tc can't wrap his mind around humans are apes, wait till he realizes mammals are descended from reptiles</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/26/18 5:15:43 PM #150:	PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. How is evolution science? Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes. I feel like you have no idea what the scientific method is? Even something that could turn out wrong can be built from good science. What scientific method can be used to try to explain the origins of humans? The fuck are you on about? The scientific method is how you make and test hypotheses. There aren't methods plural. Again, you don't even know what science is. It's like you derived your views from getting annoyed at stupid "Science is Fucking Awesome" memes. Explain how evolutionary scientists ignore the scientific method to arrive at their theories. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:914742117] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll.</quote> How is evolution science?</quote> Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins</quote> There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes.</quote> I feel like you have no idea what the scientific method is? Even something that could turn out wrong can be built from good science.</quote> What scientific method can be used to try to explain the origins of humans?</quote> The fuck are you on about? The scientific method is how you make and test hypotheses. There aren't methods plural. Again, you don't even know what science is. It's like you derived your views from getting annoyed at stupid "Science is Fucking Awesome" memes. Explain how evolutionary scientists ignore the scientific method to arrive at their theories.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PokemonExpert44 12/26/18 5:17:34 PM #151:	hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... hockeybub89 posted... PokemonExpert44 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll. How is evolution science? Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes. I feel like you have no idea what the scientific method is? Even something that could turn out wrong can be built from good science. What scientific method can be used to try to explain the origins of humans? The fuck are you on about? The scientific method is how you make and test hypotheses. There aren't methods plural. Again, you don't even know what science is. It's like you derived your views from getting annoyed at stupid "Science is Fucking Awesome" memes. What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes? --- I might just 6-0 you in Pokemon. Watch out for my teams. <cite>PokemonExpert44 posted [p:914742191] in I humans e... [t:77330875]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PokemonExpert44 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone against evolution is against science. No ifs, buts or maybes. Theres really no other way you can spin it. If you deny evolution, you deny science. Its as simple as that. And trying to spin it any other way increases the likelyhood of said person being a troll.</quote> How is evolution science?</quote> Because it uses the scientific method to try to explain the history of humankins</quote> There's no scientific method that is used to explain the history of humans evolving from apes.</quote> I feel like you have no idea what the scientific method is? Even something that could turn out wrong can be built from good science.</quote> What scientific method can be used to try to explain the origins of humans?</quote> The fuck are you on about? The scientific method is how you make and test hypotheses. There aren't methods plural. Again, you don't even know what science is. It's like you derived your views from getting annoyed at stupid "Science is Fucking Awesome" memes.</quote> What method can be used to test the plausibility that humans are apes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#152	Post #152 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > I humans evolved from apes, why are there still apes? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > I humans evolved from apes, why are there still apes?