Current Events > Crazy mob of Antifa attack Tucker Carlson's home and family.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
voldothegr8 11/09/18 11:07:07 AM #102:	RoastedCapuccin posted... @A_Good_Boy posted... https://m.sfgate.com/news/article/They-were-threatening-me-and-my-family-Tucker-13373987.php "Hey guys, attacks on media figures and journalists is immoral. Let's attack a journalist and his family because we feel morally justified!" Antifa is trash. Why do you lie? They stood in front of his house and chanted. What part of this is a scandal? wow --- Oda break tracker 2018- 7 (3) \| THE Ohio State: 7-1 \| Oakland Raiders: 1-6 Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:912104804] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>RoastedCapuccin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>https://m.sfgate.com/news/article/They-were-threatening-me-and-my-family-Tucker-13373987.php "Hey guys, attacks on media figures and journalists is immoral. Let's attack a journalist and his family because we feel morally justified!" Antifa is trash.</quote> Why do you lie? They stood in front of his house and chanted. What part of this is a scandal?</quote> wow</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkProto05 11/09/18 11:07:37 AM #103:	Carlson is a POS and now he's going to get sympathy because of these morons. --- Alpha Sapphire FC: 2552 5569 3267 <cite>DarkProto05 posted [p:912104831] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>Carlson is a POS and now he's going to get sympathy because of these morons.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 11:09:16 AM #104:	DarkProto05 posted... Carlson is a POS and now he's going to get sympathy because of these morons. I doubt there's anyone sympathizing with him now that wasn't before --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912104900] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkProto05 posted...</cite> <quote>Carlson is a POS and now he's going to get sympathy because of these morons.</quote> I doubt there's anyone sympathizing with him now that wasn't before</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CornBarn 11/09/18 11:10:37 AM #105:	averagejoel posted... CornBarn posted... Why are you lying averagejoel ? Here's the proof: https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 https://imgur.com/a/9t68rgS me: these specific people, in this specific context 200 years ago, were justified to [thing] you: HE SUPPORTS [thing] do you really not see a difference there You disputed the notion that murdering kids solely for the reason that they are high born (IE wealthy or royalty) is bad. If that isn't support then I don't know what is. <cite>CornBarn posted [p:912104967] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Why are you lying averagejoel ? Here's the proof: https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 https://imgur.com/a/9t68rgS</quote> me: these specific people, in this specific context 200 years ago, were justified to [thing] you: HE SUPPORTS [thing] do you really not see a difference there</quote> You disputed the notion that murdering kids solely for the reason that they are high born (IE wealthy or royalty) is bad. If that isn't support then I don't know what is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irregardless 11/09/18 11:10:40 AM #106:	So no one actually attacked anyone? --- no <cite>Irregardless posted [p:912104972] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>So no one actually attacked anyone?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RoastedCapuccin 11/09/18 11:12:15 AM #107:	voldothegr8 posted... RoastedCapuccin posted... @A_Good_Boy posted... https://m.sfgate.com/news/article/They-were-threatening-me-and-my-family-Tucker-13373987.php "Hey guys, attacks on media figures and journalists is immoral. Let's attack a journalist and his family because we feel morally justified!" Antifa is trash. Why do you lie? They stood in front of his house and chanted. What part of this is a scandal? wow Wow wow <cite>RoastedCapuccin posted [p:912105037] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>voldothegr8 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RoastedCapuccin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote>https://m.sfgate.com/news/article/They-were-threatening-me-and-my-family-Tucker-13373987.php "Hey guys, attacks on media figures and journalists is immoral. Let's attack a journalist and his family because we feel morally justified!" Antifa is trash.</quote> Why do you lie? They stood in front of his house and chanted. What part of this is a scandal?</quote> wow</quote> Wow wow</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 11:12:30 AM #108:	CornBarn posted... averagejoel posted... CornBarn posted... Why are you lying averagejoel ? Here's the proof: https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 https://imgur.com/a/9t68rgS me: these specific people, in this specific context 200 years ago, were justified to [thing] you: HE SUPPORTS [thing] do you really not see a difference there You disputed the notion that murdering kids solely for the reason that they are high born (IE wealthy or royalty) is bad. If that isn't support then I don't know what is. so are you lying or do you just have the reading comprehension of an average nine year old? --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912105045] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Why are you lying averagejoel ? Here's the proof: https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 https://imgur.com/a/9t68rgS</quote> me: these specific people, in this specific context 200 years ago, were justified to [thing] you: HE SUPPORTS [thing] do you really not see a difference there</quote> You disputed the notion that murdering kids solely for the reason that they are high born (IE wealthy or royalty) is bad. If that isn't support then I don't know what is.</quote> so are you lying or do you just have the reading comprehension of an average nine year old?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 11/09/18 11:13:06 AM #109:	AcFan87 posted... A_Good_Boy posted... AcFan87 posted... This is why pearl clutching and moral outrage from the left can be considered hypocritical. They are just as violent and intolerant as they claim conservatives are. Antifa is scum, plain and simple. "just as" What's the body count from Antifa compared to the body count attributed to their opponents? They trespassed on private property, which believe it or not, is a crime. They shouted death threats and even threatened to bring a pipe bomb to his home.....both of which are also crimes. This is not protesting, its an act of terrorism, nothing more, nothing less. Antifa is immoral and should be outlawed and its adherents thrown in prison. Woah, they trespassed and threatened people. That's "just as" bad as multiple murders. Like, we had a very fine topic up until a handful of chuckleheads just had to show up with their garbage. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:912105073] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote>This is why pearl clutching and moral outrage from the left can be considered hypocritical. They are just as violent and intolerant as they claim conservatives are. Antifa is scum, plain and simple.</quote> "just as" What's the body count from Antifa compared to the body count attributed to their opponents?</quote> They trespassed on private property, which believe it or not, is a crime. They shouted death threats and even threatened to bring a pipe bomb to his home.....both of which are also crimes. This is not protesting, its an act of terrorism, nothing more, nothing less. Antifa is immoral and should be outlawed and its adherents thrown in prison.</quote> Woah, they trespassed and threatened people. That's "just as" bad as multiple murders. Like, we had a very fine topic up until a handful of chuckleheads just had to show up with their garbage.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AcFan87 11/09/18 11:13:20 AM #110:	Irregardless posted... So no one actually attacked anyone? And yet crimes were still committed no matter how anyone tries to justify it. <cite>AcFan87 posted [p:912105090] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>Irregardless posted...</cite> <quote>So no one actually attacked anyone?</quote> And yet crimes were still committed no matter how anyone tries to justify it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 11/09/18 11:14:09 AM #111:	proof that you can only bait people for so long before they take it. with that said, fucking nutcases. literally outside of his home. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:912105120] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>proof that you can only bait people for so long before they take it. with that said, fucking nutcases. literally outside of his home.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 11:15:57 AM #112:	AcFan87 posted... Irregardless posted... So no one actually attacked anyone? And yet crimes were still committed no matter how anyone tries to justify it. oh no. they rang his doorbell. that poor man --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912105207] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Irregardless posted...</cite> <quote>So no one actually attacked anyone?</quote> And yet crimes were still committed no matter how anyone tries to justify it.</quote> oh no. they rang his doorbell. that poor man</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CornBarn 11/09/18 11:16:35 AM #113:	averagejoel posted... https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 Reasonable person - "Murdering kids for no reason other than being high born is pretty stupid" averagejoel - "But why?" <cite>CornBarn posted [p:912105242] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41</quote> Reasonable person - "Murdering kids for no reason other than being high born is pretty stupid" averagejoel - "But why?"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordRazziel 11/09/18 11:16:53 AM #114:	averagejoel posted... LordRazziel posted... averagejoel posted... LordRazziel posted... So, his innocent childrend can be considered an acceptable casualty? last i checked, his children were not attacked I'm sure they were frightened and terrorized. That's okay? Tucker Carlson's victims were frightened and terrified too. some of them have kids and families. This is about the innocents, man. So, if someone kills a child, it would be okay to kill their kid back. --- https://i.imgtc.com/xg91pMF.gif On really romantic evenings of self, I go salsa dancing with my confusion. <cite>LordRazziel posted [p:912105261] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LordRazziel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LordRazziel posted...</cite> <quote>So, his innocent childrend can be considered an acceptable casualty?</quote> last i checked, his children were not attacked</quote> I'm sure they were frightened and terrorized. That's okay?</quote> Tucker Carlson's victims were frightened and terrified too. some of them have kids and families.</quote> This is about the innocents, man. So, if someone kills a child, it would be okay to kill their kid back.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AcFan87 11/09/18 11:17:58 AM #115:	A_Good_Boy posted... AcFan87 posted... A_Good_Boy posted... AcFan87 posted... This is why pearl clutching and moral outrage from the left can be considered hypocritical. They are just as violent and intolerant as they claim conservatives are. Antifa is scum, plain and simple. "just as" What's the body count from Antifa compared to the body count attributed to their opponents? They trespassed on private property, which believe it or not, is a crime. They shouted death threats and even threatened to bring a pipe bomb to his home.....both of which are also crimes. This is not protesting, its an act of terrorism, nothing more, nothing less. Antifa is immoral and should be outlawed and its adherents thrown in prison. Woah, they trespassed and threatened people. That's "just as" bad as multiple murders. Like, we had a very fine topic up until a handful of chuckleheads just had to show up with their garbage. If you and those you love ever get threatened with pipe bombs and you have your home vandalized, I'll be sure to shoot you a nonchalant "whoa". I mean if that's how we are going to react to crimes now. Antifa is actually crazy enough to follow through on these threats and they are encouraging people to act with violence.....so yes, my "just as" statement still stands. <cite>AcFan87 posted [p:912105300] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote>This is why pearl clutching and moral outrage from the left can be considered hypocritical. They are just as violent and intolerant as they claim conservatives are. Antifa is scum, plain and simple.</quote> "just as" What's the body count from Antifa compared to the body count attributed to their opponents?</quote> They trespassed on private property, which believe it or not, is a crime. They shouted death threats and even threatened to bring a pipe bomb to his home.....both of which are also crimes. This is not protesting, its an act of terrorism, nothing more, nothing less. Antifa is immoral and should be outlawed and its adherents thrown in prison.</quote> Woah, they trespassed and threatened people. That's "just as" bad as multiple murders. Like, we had a very fine topic up until a handful of chuckleheads just had to show up with their garbage.</quote> If you and those you love ever get threatened with pipe bombs and you have your home vandalized, I'll be sure to shoot you a nonchalant "whoa". I mean if that's how we are going to react to crimes now. Antifa is actually crazy enough to follow through on these threats and they are encouraging people to act with violence.....so yes, my "just as" statement still stands.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 11:20:56 AM #116:	CornBarn posted... averagejoel posted... https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 Reasonable person - "Murdering kids for no reason other than being high born is pretty stupid" averagejoel - "But why?" you're completely divorcing that from context --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912105430] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41</quote> Reasonable person - "Murdering kids for no reason other than being high born is pretty stupid" averagejoel - "But why?"</quote> you're completely divorcing that from context</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irregardless 11/09/18 11:21:56 AM #117:	averagejoel posted... you're completely divorcing that from context Because it's easier than trying to address anything you might say. --- no <cite>Irregardless posted [p:912105472] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>you're completely divorcing that from context</quote> Because it's easier than trying to address anything you might say.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CornBarn 11/09/18 11:24:53 AM #118:	averagejoel posted... CornBarn posted... averagejoel posted... https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 Reasonable person - "Murdering kids for no reason other than being high born is pretty stupid" averagejoel - "But why?" you're completely divorcing that from context There is no context that justifies that. Not even saying that the kids might grow up and want to avenge their parents. It's no less sick than how the Israelites used to justify killing children in war because God told them to do it so that the other nations don't grow again. And the most telling sign that you really do support it is that you'd be okay with killing the children of the wealthy and success today because of your worldview. So trying to pass it off as just a thing of 200 years ago is dishonest. <cite>CornBarn posted [p:912105595] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41</quote> Reasonable person - "Murdering kids for no reason other than being high born is pretty stupid" averagejoel - "But why?"</quote> you're completely divorcing that from context</quote> There is no context that justifies that. Not even saying that the kids might grow up and want to avenge their parents. It's no less sick than how the Israelites used to justify killing children in war because God told them to do it so that the other nations don't grow again. And the most telling sign that you really do support it is that you'd be okay with killing the children of the wealthy and success today because of your worldview. So trying to pass it off as just a thing of 200 years ago is dishonest.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 11:27:51 AM #119:	CornBarn posted... averagejoel posted... CornBarn posted... averagejoel posted... https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 Reasonable person - "Murdering kids for no reason other than being high born is pretty stupid" averagejoel - "But why?" you're completely divorcing that from context There is no context that justifies that. Not even saying that the kids might grow up and want to avenge their parents. It's no less sick than how the Israelites used to justify killing children in war because God told them to do it so that the other nations don't grow again. the dude I was quoting was misinterpreting something I said (again, I'm not sure if it was deliberate on his part or if he was just stupid) so rather than refute his point I responded sarcastically. --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912105726] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41</quote> Reasonable person - "Murdering kids for no reason other than being high born is pretty stupid" averagejoel - "But why?"</quote> you're completely divorcing that from context</quote> There is no context that justifies that. Not even saying that the kids might grow up and want to avenge their parents. It's no less sick than how the Israelites used to justify killing children in war because God told them to do it so that the other nations don't grow again.</quote> the dude I was quoting was misinterpreting something I said (again, I'm not sure if it was deliberate on his part or if he was just stupid) so rather than refute his point I responded sarcastically.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CornBarn 11/09/18 11:29:04 AM #120:	"I was just being sarcastic!!!" haha ok <cite>CornBarn posted [p:912105782] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>"I was just being sarcastic!!!" haha ok</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 11:29:58 AM #121:	CornBarn posted... "I was just being sarcastic!!!" haha ok averagejoel posted... so are you lying or do you just have the reading comprehension of an average nine year old? --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912105820] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>"I was just being sarcastic!!!" haha ok</quote> <cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote> so are you lying or do you just have the reading comprehension of an average nine year old?</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 11/09/18 11:32:10 AM #122:	AcFan87 posted... A_Good_Boy posted... AcFan87 posted... A_Good_Boy posted... AcFan87 posted... This is why pearl clutching and moral outrage from the left can be considered hypocritical. They are just as violent and intolerant as they claim conservatives are. Antifa is scum, plain and simple. "just as" What's the body count from Antifa compared to the body count attributed to their opponents? They trespassed on private property, which believe it or not, is a crime. They shouted death threats and even threatened to bring a pipe bomb to his home.....both of which are also crimes. This is not protesting, its an act of terrorism, nothing more, nothing less. Antifa is immoral and should be outlawed and its adherents thrown in prison. Woah, they trespassed and threatened people. That's "just as" bad as multiple murders. Like, we had a very fine topic up until a handful of chuckleheads just had to show up with their garbage. If you and those you love ever get threatened with pipe bombs and you have your home vandalized, I'll be sure to shoot you a nonchalant "whoa". I mean if that's how we are going to react to crimes now. Antifa is actually crazy enough to follow through on these threats and they are encouraging people to act with violence.....so yes, my "just as" statement still stands. That's literally not how I've reacted to the topic at all. It's how I reacted to your stupid posts. If you didn't want people reacting to you saying stupid as shit then you should have just stayed on topic like everyone else. If you had bothered to have actually read the topic I even already said that comparing Antifa to neo-nazis is wildly inappropriate. Antifa is already bad enough as it is without you needing to make false comparisons to other shit. No need to just throw away nuance because you have trouble seeing different actions for what they are. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:912105932] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote>This is why pearl clutching and moral outrage from the left can be considered hypocritical. They are just as violent and intolerant as they claim conservatives are. Antifa is scum, plain and simple.</quote> "just as" What's the body count from Antifa compared to the body count attributed to their opponents?</quote> They trespassed on private property, which believe it or not, is a crime. They shouted death threats and even threatened to bring a pipe bomb to his home.....both of which are also crimes. This is not protesting, its an act of terrorism, nothing more, nothing less. Antifa is immoral and should be outlawed and its adherents thrown in prison.</quote> Woah, they trespassed and threatened people. That's "just as" bad as multiple murders. Like, we had a very fine topic up until a handful of chuckleheads just had to show up with their garbage.</quote> If you and those you love ever get threatened with pipe bombs and you have your home vandalized, I'll be sure to shoot you a nonchalant "whoa". I mean if that's how we are going to react to crimes now. Antifa is actually crazy enough to follow through on these threats and they are encouraging people to act with violence.....so yes, my "just as" statement still stands.</quote> That's literally not how I've reacted to the topic at all. It's how I reacted to your stupid posts. If you didn't want people reacting to you saying stupid as shit then you should have just stayed on topic like everyone else. If you had bothered to have actually read the topic I even already said that comparing Antifa to neo-nazis is wildly inappropriate. Antifa is already bad enough as it is without you needing to make false comparisons to other shit. No need to just throw away nuance because you have trouble seeing different actions for what they are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 12:54:55 PM #123:	hey @CornBarn you didn't answer my question averagejoel posted... are you lying or do you just have the reading comprehension of an average nine year old? --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912110147] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>hey @CornBarn you didn't answer my question <cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>are you lying or do you just have the reading comprehension of an average nine year old?</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 11/09/18 1:03:53 PM #124:	Those words are too long, so of course he didn't respond to the question. Some of those words even had more than 2 syllables. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:912110582] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>Those words are too long, so of course he didn't respond to the question. Some of those words even had more than 2 syllables.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CornBarn 11/09/18 1:10:33 PM #125:	Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. <cite>CornBarn posted [p:912110891] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 1:11:50 PM #126:	ok this must be another proudclad alt --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912110958] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>ok this must be another proudclad alt</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Ayatollah C 11/09/18 1:13:36 PM #127:	Probably would have been a good thing if Goebbels would have been strung up, or at least put off, in 1935. Him and his mates. --- It made more sense in my head I don't know <cite>The Ayatollah C posted [p:912111024] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>Probably would have been a good thing if Goebbels would have been strung up, or at least put off, in 1935. Him and his mates.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 11/09/18 1:14:40 PM #128:	CornBarn posted... averagejoel posted... CornBarn posted... Why are you lying averagejoel ? Here's the proof: https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 https://imgur.com/a/9t68rgS me: these specific people, in this specific context 200 years ago, were justified to [thing] you: HE SUPPORTS [thing] do you really not see a difference there You disputed the notion that murdering kids solely for the reason that they are high born (IE wealthy or royalty) is bad. If that isn't support then I don't know what is. In that case, you don't know what is. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:912111072] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Why are you lying averagejoel ? Here's the proof: https://imgur.com/a/fjYrX41 https://imgur.com/a/9t68rgS</quote> me: these specific people, in this specific context 200 years ago, were justified to [thing] you: HE SUPPORTS [thing] do you really not see a difference there</quote> You disputed the notion that murdering kids solely for the reason that they are high born (IE wealthy or royalty) is bad. If that isn't support then I don't know what is.</quote> In that case, you don't know what is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 11/09/18 1:28:58 PM #129:	CornBarn posted... Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:912111858] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iPhone_7 11/09/18 1:34:22 PM #130:	When they go low we go high --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:912112137] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>When they go low we go high</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 11/09/18 1:42:35 PM #131:	iPhone_7 posted... When they go low we go high Pretty sure she wasn't including Antifa in that statement. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:912112551] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>iPhone_7 posted...</cite> <quote>When they go low we go high</quote> Pretty sure she wasn't including Antifa in that statement.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Grischnak 11/09/18 1:43:28 PM #132:	averagejoel posted... how many innocent people have antifa hurt? "Hurt" in terms of this argument is harassment. So how many innocent people have Antifa harassed? Tens of thousands I'd assume? Hard to pinpoint an exact number but we're talking about a group whose MO is to block off large, high traffic areas and harass any innocent people walking/driving by that don't kowtow to them. Oh and if they are in an especially pissy mood they'll destroy the property of innocent people. <cite>Grischnak posted [p:912112587] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>how many innocent people have antifa hurt?</quote> "Hurt" in terms of this argument is harassment. So how many innocent people have Antifa harassed? Tens of thousands I'd assume? Hard to pinpoint an exact number but we're talking about a group whose MO is to block off large, high traffic areas and harass any innocent people walking/driving by that don't kowtow to them. Oh and if they are in an especially pissy mood they'll destroy the property of innocent people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iPhone_7 11/09/18 1:48:27 PM #133:	A_Good_Boy posted... iPhone_7 posted... When they go low we go high Pretty sure she wasn't including Antifa in that statement. CEs Antifa defenders love that line --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:912112860] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>iPhone_7 posted...</cite> <quote>When they go low we go high</quote> Pretty sure she wasn't including Antifa in that statement.</quote> CEs Antifa defenders love that line</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nexigrams 11/09/18 1:56:48 PM #134:	I wanna be upset about this, but as a general rule, I think any time crazy wants to engage crazy with the possibility that maybe they cancel each other out, I'm ok with it. --- https://imgur.com/SYiqIRC <cite>nexigrams posted [p:912113270] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>I wanna be upset about this, but as a general rule, I think any time crazy wants to engage crazy with the possibility that maybe they cancel each other out, I'm ok with it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 11/09/18 2:32:14 PM #135:	nexigrams posted... I wanna be upset about this, but as a general rule, I think any time crazy wants to engage crazy with the possibility that maybe they cancel each other out, I'm ok with it. they should go to his office and harass him there. but leave his kids and wife alone. especially his kids. they lost all credibility and sympathy when they threatened to kill his children with a pipe bomb <cite>Zikten posted [p:912114980] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>nexigrams posted...</cite> <quote>I wanna be upset about this, but as a general rule, I think any time crazy wants to engage crazy with the possibility that maybe they cancel each other out, I'm ok with it.</quote> they should go to his office and harass him there. but leave his kids and wife alone. especially his kids. they lost all credibility and sympathy when they threatened to kill his children with a pipe bomb</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TES_Nut 11/09/18 2:33:49 PM #136:	At least they weren't gypsies --- The ending of the word is ALMSIVI <cite>TES_Nut posted [p:912115067] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>At least they weren't gypsies</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 11/09/18 2:43:41 PM #137:	Wait, Antifa had credibility? --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:912115573] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>Wait, Antifa had credibility?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 4:56:07 PM #138:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... CornBarn posted... Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident. it's probably the same dude tbh --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912122354] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident.</quote> it's probably the same dude tbh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#139	Post #139 was unavailable or deleted.
Kazi1212 11/09/18 6:02:00 PM #140:	GregShmedley posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... CornBarn posted... Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident. That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine. Yea Ive seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was try again. Theres really no pleasing some folk here even if youre trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them. --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?" <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:912125497] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident.</quote> That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine.</quote> Yea Ive seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was try again. Theres really no pleasing some folk here even if youre trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#141	Post #141 was unavailable or deleted.
Kazi1212 11/09/18 6:11:41 PM #142:	GregShmedley posted... Kazi1212 posted... GregShmedley posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... CornBarn posted... Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident. That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine. Yea Ive seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending try again. Theres really no pleasing some folk here even if youre trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them. Oh, he admits that he purposefully uses ad hominem attacks in his argument so people can call him out on it. I guess it's his way of thinking he "wins" because people don't want to engage with someone so hostile and therefore stop replying. He's like Unfair but not a gimmick. I also know for a fact he has at least 2 alts here, sometimes I see them posting together in the same topic lmfao --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?" <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:912125955] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident.</quote> That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine.</quote> Yea Ive seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending try again. Theres really no pleasing some folk here even if youre trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them.</quote> Oh, he admits that he purposefully uses ad hominem attacks in his argument so people can call him out on it. I guess it's his way of thinking he "wins" because people don't want to engage with someone so hostile and therefore stop replying. He's like Unfair but not a gimmick.</quote> I also know for a fact he has at least 2 alts here, sometimes I see them posting together in the same topic lmfao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 11/09/18 6:17:20 PM #143:	here are a couple good twitter threads on the topic one from a guy who was doxxed by Tucker Carlson's website: https://twitter.com/slpng_giants/status/1060552782422269952 one from another smart dude who knows what he's talking about: https://twitter.com/PrettyBadLefty/status/1060626816778620928 --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:912126251] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>here are a couple good twitter threads on the topic one from a guy who was doxxed by Tucker Carlson's website: https://twitter.com/slpng_giants/status/1060552782422269952 one from another smart dude who knows what he's talking about: https://twitter.com/PrettyBadLefty/status/1060626816778620928</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 11/09/18 6:19:22 PM #144:	GregShmedley posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... CornBarn posted... Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident. That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were too focused on your own points to even consider mine. That's exactly how it went down. You were demanding that the conversation remain as narrow as what you and Rebel were arguing with joel and someone else about and you didn't like that I wasn't staying within that scope. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:912126353] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident.</quote> That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were too focused on your own points to even consider mine.</quote> That's exactly how it went down. You were demanding that the conversation remain as narrow as what you and Rebel were arguing with joel and someone else about and you didn't like that I wasn't staying within that scope.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 11/09/18 6:23:29 PM #145:	Kazi1212 posted... GregShmedley posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... CornBarn posted... Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident. That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine. Yea I?ve seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending ?try again?. There?s really no pleasing some folk here even if you?re trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them. I doubt that representation of that conversation is anywhere near accurate. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:912126541] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident.</quote> That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine.</quote> Yea I?ve seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending ?try again?. There?s really no pleasing some folk here even if you?re trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them.</quote> I doubt that representation of that conversation is anywhere near accurate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NinjaWarrior455 11/09/18 6:23:50 PM #146:	Here comes Greg shitposting again. --- Super Bowl 52 Champions!!!! http://myanimelist.net/animelist/NinjaWarrior457 <cite>NinjaWarrior455 posted [p:912126557] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>Here comes Greg shitposting again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CornBarn 11/09/18 6:24:59 PM #147:	GregShmedley posted... Kazi1212 posted... GregShmedley posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... CornBarn posted... Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident. That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine. Yea Ive seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending try again. Theres really no pleasing some folk here even if youre trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them. Oh, he admits that he purposefully uses ad hominem attacks in his argument so people can call him out on it. I guess it's his way of thinking he "wins" because people don't want to engage with someone so hostile and therefore stop replying. He's like Unfair but not a gimmick. He definitely has some serious problems that he needs to deal with, ideally with professional guidance so that he doesn't lash out against innocent people when he inevitably snaps. <cite>CornBarn posted [p:912126609] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident.</quote> That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine.</quote> Yea Ive seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending try again. Theres really no pleasing some folk here even if youre trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them.</quote> Oh, he admits that he purposefully uses ad hominem attacks in his argument so people can call him out on it. I guess it's his way of thinking he "wins" because people don't want to engage with someone so hostile and therefore stop replying. He's like Unfair but not a gimmick.</quote> He definitely has some serious problems that he needs to deal with, ideally with professional guidance so that he doesn't lash out against innocent people when he inevitably snaps.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 11/09/18 6:27:39 PM #148:	GregShmedley posted... Kazi1212 posted... GregShmedley posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... CornBarn posted... Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident. That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine. Yea I?ve seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending ?try again?. There?s really no pleasing some folk here even if you?re trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them. Oh, he admits that he purposefully uses ad hominem attacks in his argument so people can call him out on it. I guess it's his way of thinking he "wins" because people don't want to engage with someone so hostile and therefore stop replying. He's like Unfair but not a gimmick. Nope. Not what happened. I said I often open arguments with ad hominem to see what reactions I get so I know whether or not a person is even worth engaging with. You were, at first, so I laid off of those tactics. You started ignoring too much of what I was saying so I had to disengage and prod you for responses. I don't even argue to win. I argue to get reads on people. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:912126747] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident.</quote> That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine.</quote> Yea I?ve seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending ?try again?. There?s really no pleasing some folk here even if you?re trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them.</quote> Oh, he admits that he purposefully uses ad hominem attacks in his argument so people can call him out on it. I guess it's his way of thinking he "wins" because people don't want to engage with someone so hostile and therefore stop replying. He's like Unfair but not a gimmick.</quote> Nope. Not what happened. I said I often open arguments with ad hominem to see what reactions I get so I know whether or not a person is even worth engaging with. You were, at first, so I laid off of those tactics. You started ignoring too much of what I was saying so I had to disengage and prod you for responses. I don't even argue to win. I argue to get reads on people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#149	Post #149 was unavailable or deleted.
Kazi1212 11/09/18 6:36:00 PM #150:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... GregShmedley posted... Kazi1212 posted... GregShmedley posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... CornBarn posted... Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions. I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident. That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine. Yea I?ve seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending ?try again?. There?s really no pleasing some folk here even if you?re trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them. Oh, he admits that he purposefully uses ad hominem attacks in his argument so people can call him out on it. I guess it's his way of thinking he "wins" because people don't want to engage with someone so hostile and therefore stop replying. He's like Unfair but not a gimmick. Nope. Not what happened. I said I often open arguments with ad hominem to see what reactions I get so I know whether or not a person is even worth engaging with. You were, at first, so I laid off of those tactics. You started ignoring too much of what I was saying so I had to disengage and prod you for responses. I don't even argue to win. I argue to get reads on people. So basically youre disingenuous and wasting peoples time, thanks for sharing --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?" <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:912127159] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CornBarn posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone who is worth interacting with knows that your perspective is abominable and irredeemable. I don't need to answer any of your worthless questions.</quote> I was once asked in an argument on this subject when joel was being dogpiled again if I condoned what joel is accused of condoning here. I explained how interpreted the historical cases and how the logic behind killing said kids would apply differently today and how other avenues could be utilized for the sake of maintaining security while not killing the kids. The user who asked me refused to address or even acknowledge anything that I said. I had to hound him repeatedly and after demanding a response four or five times, he finally caved, but only replied "I only wanted a yes or no answer so I wouldn't have replied to anything that wasn't just yes or no." That is the bullshittiest and most transparent copout imaginable. This response from you reminds me of that incident.</quote> That is not how that went down...at all. I even explained to you my reasoning but you were to lo focused on your own points to even consider mine.</quote> Yea I?ve seen him like that before as well. Just the other day I explained myself to him about my opinion on Trump because he accused me of never criticizing him. I even also kindly explained my opinion to him for being harder on Acosta for the fiasco the other day because that what the topic was about it. All he basically had to say was a condescending ?try again?. There?s really no pleasing some folk here even if you?re trying to be nice and explain your view, best to just avoid them.</quote> Oh, he admits that he purposefully uses ad hominem attacks in his argument so people can call him out on it. I guess it's his way of thinking he "wins" because people don't want to engage with someone so hostile and therefore stop replying. He's like Unfair but not a gimmick.</quote> Nope. Not what happened. I said I often open arguments with ad hominem to see what reactions I get so I know whether or not a person is even worth engaging with. You were, at first, so I laid off of those tactics. You started ignoring too much of what I was saying so I had to disengage and prod you for responses. I don't even argue to win. I argue to get reads on people.</quote> So basically youre disingenuous and wasting peoples time, thanks for sharing</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
unclekoolaid73 11/09/18 6:41:35 PM #151:	https://www.reviewjournal.com/entertainment/celebrity/police-probe-protest-at-tucker-carlsons-home-as-hate-crime-1523284/ Seems it being treated as a hate crime. --- https://imgur.com/NilNCvi <cite>unclekoolaid73 posted [p:912127443] in Crazy mob ... [t:77183558]...</cite> <quote>https://www.reviewjournal.com/entertainment/celebrity/police-probe-protest-at-tucker-carlsons-home-as-hate-crime-1523284/ Seems it being treated as a hate crime.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > Crazy mob of Antifa attack Tucker Carlson's home and family. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Crazy mob of Antifa attack Tucker Carlson's home and family.