Topic List |
Page List:
1 |
---|---|
Smallville 06/04/18 6:26:59 PM #1: |
Did you agree with it? the supreme court ruled that the bakery didn't have to serve a gay couple iirc their wedding cake.... - Results (15 votes)
i agree with the supreme court's decision, they shouldn't have to serve this couple
80% (12 votes)
12
i disagree with the supreme court
20% (3 votes)
3
--- "I've always wanted there to be nothing between us. Now there's not"----smallville ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Nomadic View 06/04/18 6:30:28 PM #2: |
They didnt really answer the main underlying question. They ruled in favor of the bakers simply because the Colorado Civil Rights Commission were acting in an egregious and unnecessarily hostile manner.
--- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Smallville 06/04/18 6:34:24 PM #3: |
Nomadic View posted...
They didnt really answer the main underlying question. They ruled in favor of the bakers simply because the Colorado Civil Rights Commission were acting in an egregious and unnecessarily hostile manner. yeah i did hear that's what they ruled in this case but wouldn't rule if it applied to any business in the u.s. iirc --- "I've always wanted there to be nothing between us. Now there's not"----smallville ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Nomadic View 06/04/18 6:39:32 PM #4: |
I do like the precedent that you will lose a case if you cannot conduct yourself in a civilized manner. But I do wish that the Court would have answered the underlying question rather than copping out because one side was really nasty.
--- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Topic List |
Page List:
1 |