Current Events > Do you consider Brock Lesnar a great champion?

(+) Yeah! (+)

What are your thoughts?
---

It's one of those things where you could say it makes the belt mean more since it's not defended all the time like, like the old days, but you can't do that anymore really.
---

No

Puts on some good matches but that's about it
---

I don't care as much because we all know Roman Reigns is going to be the one to beat him. There's no exciting mystery to it about who is going to slay this unstoppable, all-conquering, powerful wildebeest. Everyone is just filler until Reigns gets yet another "crowning moment"
---

Brock Lesnar is cool and larger than the WWE.

I don't watch wrestling but I would pay money if Brock Lesnar was on the card just because of who he is.

Plus his gimmick is to beat the hell out of people. It's fun to watch
---

https://www.cagesideseats.com/2017/11/26/16701000/who-will-brock-lesnar-face-at-the-royal-rumble
---

nope he rarely defends the damn belt. hes gonna hold it a year before dropping it to roman at mania
---

Bluebomber182 posted...

nope he rarely defends the damn belt. hes gonna hold it a year before dropping it to roman at mania

http://popculture.com/wwe/2017/11/29/3-reasons-why-john-cena-wwe-only-option-brock-lesnar-royal-rumbl/

Hmm
---

The Stroman match left a bad taste in my mouth that still hasn't gone away.
---

No.
---

Not anymore, no. I didn't mind his reign at first and actually liked his match with Joe, but after that it pretty much became Lesnar running down the entire roster. It's not doing much to help build up Lesnar because he already had the mystique after he beat Undertaker, so it's just making the rest of the roster look weak. It especially doesn't help when you know it's going to lead to another match with Roman at wrestlemania where they put the belt on him. They should have either put the belt on Strowman or save that match for the Rumble and not a B tier pay per view.
---