Topic List |
Page List:
1 |
---|---|
THEGODDAMNBATMA 11/12/17 1:20:24 PM #1: |
They're incredibly fun, well-made, and awesome games that get shit on for no reason other than the fact that they are often yearly-releases and because they're published by Ubisoft (a publisher who gets too much hate).
... Copied to Clipboard!
|
FellWolf 11/12/17 1:21:48 PM #2: |
I only played the first 2 and they were nice. They were fun.
--- ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
DirtBasedSoap 11/12/17 1:26:01 PM #3: |
... Copied to Clipboard!
|
thecolorgreen 11/12/17 1:31:52 PM #4: |
1, 2, brotherhood, and 4 are good. The rest are trash
--- :wq ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
#5 | Post #5 was unavailable or deleted. |
LeetCheet 11/12/17 1:33:16 PM #6: |
Didn't the Assassin's Creed franchise start to get a bad rep when Assassin's Creed 3 released?
Ezio is probably the best character in the series as well. --- ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
SKARDAVNELNATE 11/12/17 2:03:37 PM #7: |
I started marathoning the series. Hoping to get to 4 before I take a break. So far 1 is kind of awkward. 2 has some nice improvements. I probably played Brotherhood wrong because I found it has too many time wasters, I've spent 1/4 of the game standing around waiting for timers to expire because I wanted to finish what was available before progressing with the plot. I guess I should have let them go until late game.
With 1 I got better synchronization, and thus more health, by doing the optional stuff. I eventually realized this gave me a false impression for the later games where character strength is more closely tied to plot progression. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Topic List |
Page List:
1 |