Current Events > What do you consider "good writing"?

Topic List
Page List: 1
LightningAce11
09/02/17 4:45:23 AM
#1:


Just keen to hear what people think. What do you like/dislike in books. movies and TV?
---
"I'm an atheist too but still believe in hell. That's where you're headed pal." - Mr_Karate_II
... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456
09/02/17 4:49:59 AM
#2:


... Copied to Clipboard!
USANumber1
09/02/17 4:54:28 AM
#3:


Detailed descriptions of descriptions of sex in written passages.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber
09/02/17 4:56:30 AM
#4:


It honestly depends. I read To Have and Have Not and The Picture of Dorian Gray back to back. Both were unbelievably well written (even if the former is generally considered Hemingway's weakest book), but were polar opposites in terms of technique.

Hemingway used a journalistic, simplistic style similar to Orwell. Everything was matter of fact and straight forward. Pointless details were left to the reader's imagination and the focus was on the story. However, his stories still could take mundane tasks (such as fishing) and make them the stuff of Greek Epics.

Oscar Wilde, on the other hand, described everything in his one book in painful detail. Sometimes it almost felt too much. However, it perfectly suited the story and it reflected the protagonists growing disinterest in his hedonistic material lifestyle. The descriptions and dialogue were clever and well written.

It's like movies, though. Some movies are amazing because of their technical merits, where as other excel at their dialouge. For books, what I think it really comes down to is writing that suits the tone and narrative of the story. If you have a book that is about a very matter-of-fact, grounded story, a flowery description of every minute detail might not be the best idea.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1