LogFAQs > #979974599

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	PSA about the "hornypost" ban.
Citrik 04/18/24 8:02:08 AM #248:	pokedude900 posted... What. Are. The. Rules? It has now been a full day since I asked this question on Ask the Mods, and we're still no closer to an answer. We have asked that clearer guidelines be published, both for userbase reference as well as ours. I don't know when that's coming. I tried to provide a generalized guideline in a previous topic which basically amounted to don't objectify individuals. I think there is a level of moderator discretion that will come into play, and I wouldn't expect a detailed breakdown of each and every possible infraction. It will be a learning curve for us all and direction has been given to provide some leniency as this is navigated. Board_hunter567 posted... Would these mods be better at handling disputes specifically as they relate to flamingo biology? Because you've got a serious problem with that. No one wants to talk about the problems flamingos cause us though as a species. Let me know when you're ready for that conversation. Revelation34 posted... You're the one who still wants to be a moderator after the changes were made. Even prior to this there were rules I had to enforce that I didn't necessarily agree with. Comes with the role. But being in this position allowed me to advocate for change, and we're at a point now where that's probably more important than ever. That is why I stayed. --- Buried alive in the coffin of who I used to be Valjackal is dead. <cite>Citrik posted [p:979974599] in PSA about ... [t:80749420]...</cite> <quote>pokedude900 posted... </cite><quote>What. Are. The. Rules?It has now been a full day since I asked this question on Ask the Mods, and we're still no closer to an answer.</quote>We have asked that clearer guidelines be published, both for userbase reference as well as ours. I don't know when that's coming. I tried to provide a generalized guideline in a previous topic which basically amounted to don't objectify individuals. I think there is a level of moderator discretion that will come into play, and I wouldn't expect a detailed breakdown of each and every possible infraction. It will be a learning curve for us all and direction has been given to provide some leniency as this is navigated.Board_hunter567 posted... </cite><quote>Would these mods be better at handling disputes specifically as they relate to flamingo biology? Because you've got a serious problem with that.</quote>No one wants to talk about the problems flamingos cause us though as a species. Let me know when you're ready for that conversation.Revelation34 posted... </cite><quote>You're the one who still wants to be a moderator after the changes were made.</quote>Even prior to this there were rules I had to enforce that I didn't necessarily agree with. Comes with the role. But being in this position allowed me to advocate for change, and we're at a point now where that's probably more important than ever. That is why I stayed. --- Buried alive in the coffin of who I used to beValjackal is dead.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1