LogFAQs > #979953337

Doe posted...

I looked and here's evidence the pro Israel groups cited in her social media likes as her being an antisemite
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/f7c81070.jpg

... they highlight "abolish Israel" and imply it shows she's calling for the genocide of Jewish people despite minoring in "resistance to genocide"... but the very next clause, not even next sentence but the next clause after the semicolon, is saying the opposite, that people should all remain in the land just without apartheid.

"Compromise" is very very generous IMO. This college apparently has programs studying genocide and apartheid and resistance but when the time comes that a student who took those classes gets great grades and extracurriculars, they back off and say "we won't risk her actually speaking what she learned in our classes!"

I dont understand what this is saying. Did she write this? As in my link they cited a link she has in her profile. She says she didnt write this.

Either way the texts is contradictory saying Israel should be abolished then going on to say both isralites and palestinians can live together.

And you say its a jump but to abolish israel wouldn't happen unless they lose some war and are either all forced to leave or destroyed.

As for the apartheid the lines were drawn in other conflicts such as when they fought off the british and officially claimed the land as far as i know and their differences werw never settled. I think this is very different from africa apparteid.

Either way all she says is this was from 5 years ago....yet she still has it in her profile now. And doesn't seem to clarify it saying she doesn't want to abolish israel or say she would remove the link either.

cjsdowg posted...

That isn't a compromise.

Eh neither side got what they fully wanted and both sides got something. Its the dictionary definition of compromise.