LogFAQs > #979901139

reincarnator07 posted...

'm not arguing that a machine is less accurate than humans, I'm arguing that it's far easier to change a significant number of votes through electronic voting when compared to compromising the number of people while also being easier to conceal. Is it paranoid? Yes. That level of paranoia is justified when we're talking national elections though.

Do you have a source or any sort of evidence for the bolded claim? Like, what is even sort of giving you the impression that this is possible?

I honestly can't believe the argument that you're even trying to make. You know there's safeguards in place to make sure numbers can't just be changed? Like do you even have a cursory understanding on how the vote counting machines work or just imagining how it works in your head?

Not to mention the insanity of saying "but somehow someone can compromise the numbers" while not realizing an actual human who would be taking the numbers would be infinitely easier to compromise.