LogFAQs > #979851418

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThe New York Times: both sides
NoMeLx22x
04/11/24 8:30:16 AM
#6:


I would need to read the article to see what their issue is with Biden's abortion message and how they think it doesn't line up with their constituents.

What is their reasoning for that?

After actually reading the article: the author is talking about how Biden has been wishy-washy on his full commitment to abortion leading up to the overturning of Roe v Wade, and how that might leave some of his constituents feeling like he's not 100% behind full access to abortion.

It's definitely a dumb way to word the headline. They're basically saying that some Biden supporters might feel like he hasn't gone far enough in his defense of abortion. And while somewhat true in the past, it's nitpicking at best. He's certainly spent the last couple decades as very vocal in how important Roe v Wade is.

---
Sigs are for losers.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1