LogFAQs > #979805966

I made that statement after coming across Ponco for the first time. The name Metis rings no bells for me.

Just finished the case, I suppose that is a twist, but (thankfully) not 3-4 levels of dark and depressing. I doubt we are going the route of "the defence lawyer did it" (that already happened last game), so the evidence has to be fake or misinterpreted in some way. So either somebody planted the prints on the lighter (Foolbright has opportunity, but that would be insanely silly), Foolbright unintentionally contaminated the evidence (still silly, but more in character), or something very weird is going on...