LogFAQs > #979784126

s0nicfan posted...

Or, here's a crazy idea, instead of trying to fit an infinite number of people into a handful of extremely in demand City centers, why don't we develop the remaining 99% of the country to make it more desirable so that people have more options? Let's stop pretending that living in the Bay area is some sort of basic human right and start getting practical about housing by making it worthwhile to live somewhere else.

People generally live where jobs exist. I'm fine if you think we should incentivise more companies to do remote work or open up more branches in smaller towns. The thing is, that still requires housing to be built in those smaller towns so I'm that priced don't increase.

We should also build housing in large cities because obviously some companies and people want to be in those cities.

I'm for building housing everywhere. That's the difference between me and I guess you.

Both require large amounts of work in terms of either