LogFAQs > #979625704

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Nigerian woman reviewed some tomato puree online. Now she faces jail
Snip-N-Snails 03/29/24 12:23:44 PM #49:	electricbugs2 posted... Agreed. I was fully ready to come into this topic and be pissed off by some backwards nonsense, but this is actually a good law. Ricemills posted... Yes, one of those who realised that review bombing is vile. Also the one who realize that influencer using their power to make their followers doing vile things for them are criminals. You people on the other hand believes that "free speech" are allowed even when they caused harm and should be immune to all repercussions. Do you think boycotts should be illegal? The problem with review bombs is the notion that it comes from misinformation in which case it can sued for libel but it has to be enough to be considered libel. Simply being negative isnt libel. Otherwise parodies and satire would be illegal. --- #BLM <cite>Snip-N-Snails posted [p:979625704] in Nigerian w... [t:80733463]...</cite> <quote>electricbugs2 posted... </cite><quote>Agreed.I was fully ready to come into this topic and be pissed off by some backwards nonsense, but this is actually a good law.</quote>Ricemills posted... </cite><quote>Yes, one of those who realised that review bombing is vile.Also the one who realize that influencer using their power to make their followers doing vile things for them are criminals.You people on the other hand believes that "free speech" are allowed even when they caused harm and should be immune to all repercussions.</quote>Do you think boycotts should be illegal? The problem with review bombs is the notion that it comes from misinformation in which case it can sued for libel but it has to be enough to be considered libel. Simply being negative isnt libel. Otherwise parodies and satire would be illegal. --- #BLM</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1