LogFAQs > #979524644

Toonstrack posted...

I described that already.

Yes, you stated that the board was taken down to the actions of people on it, which has already been proven false by people in the know.

No, YOU were implying that I thought the board got shot down due to its leaning one way or another. Your own words, a "liberal echo chamber". It didn't get shut down Because if its lean, it got shut down, in part, because people like the guy i wss responding too make the board toxic and difficult to moderate.

I didn't "imply" shit. You flat out stated that it was due to actions of posters. That is false.

Its funny how you're literally trying to change the comment you made in real time. Im going to remind you like I did the other guy we can see what you said. Its not what I said. That simple.

This gaslighting isn't working. At all.

Its not gaslighting, it's me pointing out that your opinion is wrong.

The answer to your question is no. I think we all agree he shouldn't have been there.

So thank you for admitting that if Kyle hadn't

-procurred a firearm through extremely questionable methods (that someone went to jail for)
-traveled 45 minutes one way across state lines
-decided to act as a vigilante despite not being qualified to serve as law enforcement or private security

that two people wouldn't have died.

You can't claim self defense when you go looking for trouble, and bringing an assault rifle anywhere other than a gun range certainly qualifies.

He was there (in his words) for "cleaning graffiti" and "rendering medical aid". What part of either of those activities did he need a gun for? An assault rifle's sole purpose for existing is to end life as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Plus, there's the teensy tiny matter of
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/d/d3c23b96.jpg

Like I said, but "self-defense" though.