LogFAQs > #979412765

ai123 posted...

Dammit, they're right!

If only there was some method of comparison that didn't rely on memory.

Their angle is obvious. They want to build more coal power and the only comment they make on renewable energy they tie to foreign-ownership. What about local ownership? And is there any guarantee they want to reduce foreign-ownership and nationalize it instead? Or do they just want it to be privately owned locally instead?

And what alarms me most is that part about unemployment benefits. They're going with the old boomer bullshit idea that long-term unemployment only exists because people choose to be. No mention of addressing discrimination, especially based on things like criminal record, and also no acknowledgement of the fact that a certain degree of unemployment exists by design and the government has stated they accept it.