LogFAQs > #979335579

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	azuarc tries not to be a NIMBY
Colegreen_c12 03/12/24 7:05:15 PM #18:	foolm0r0n posted... Damn that's sooooo much surface parking. 1.5/unit residential is so stupid. Flex/office area looks terrible, 1-story buildings and 50% of the land is surface parking, and no walkability to there either. Just why? Is land so cheap on this plot that they can afford such poor land use? Mixed use and supermarket area looks sweet though. Could easily be a fully car-free community Where do you live, this is super common in a ton of places. And i'm assuming this is a suburban area where "car-free" communities don't really exist. foolm0r0n posted... parking vertically If you mean parking garages, parking garages are absurdly expensive compared to parking lots and should be avoided if not neccessary --- DPOblivion beat us all. <cite>Colegreen_c12 posted [p:979335579] in azuarc tri... [t:80719171]...</cite> <quote>foolm0r0n posted... </cite><quote>Damn that's sooooo much surface parking. 1.5/unit residential is so stupid. Flex/office area looks terrible, 1-story buildings and 50% of the land is surface parking, and no walkability to there either. Just why? Is land so cheap on this plot that they can afford such poor land use? Mixed use and supermarket area looks sweet though. Could easily be a fully car-free community</quote>Where do you live, this is super common in a ton of places. And i'm assuming this is a suburban area where "car-free" communities don't really exist.foolm0r0n posted... </cite><quote>parking vertically</quote>If you mean parking garages, parking garages are absurdly expensive compared to parking lots and should be avoided if not neccessary --- DPOblivion beat us all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1