LogFAQs > #979275205

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTo circumcise or not?
Enclave
03/09/24 10:21:01 AM
#309:


Zonbei posted...
Cool pretending to be a psychologist you did there. Im not defensive about it at all; I legitimately am glad it was done and feel better off, personally. You can believe whatever you want, but its a story youre telling yourself.

Ive said multiple times I dont know much about the experience of having a foreskin, because I dont have one, and can only speak on what others have told me.

The only thing Ive said that may be objectively wrong that I didnt get from uncircumcised friend and women who have been with uncircumcised men was that the glans shouldnt be eternally moist; I was talking more about dampness, water, sweat, etc, but I was surprised to find uncircumcised penises actually secrete what is essentially mucus, which I presume is what the other guy meant. (Although that is less a function of the foreskin and more the glans, the foreskin does keep the mucus membrane from keratinizing, so in a roundabout way it keeps it moist, in terms of gross dick mucus.)

the incidence of HIV and STDS isnt wildly different between these two counties so clearly circumcising has no impact has been addressed MULTIPLE times already. That isnt how that works. You cant possibly draw that conclusion, many factors affect those rates. Europe has public health care, but by your logic, that has zero effect on std spread, despite the fact thats obviously not true.

Also, nobody has ever said it was a huge impact. Its a minor benefit.

Not pretending to be a psychologist, look at your freakin' replies, you are absolutely ignorant on this issue.

Also I don't really care if you've "addressed" anything since your addressing it is all nonsense. You're making wild reaches to try to excuse performing unnecessary and non-consensual cosmetic surgery on babies and likely because it was done to you so that's why you're taking that side. It's nonsensical.

I mean seriously, it's apples to fucking apples, especially when you're comparing Europe to North America (which includes Canada by the way which DOES have public healthcare). Having access to free healthcare is not going to make it less likely for penis cancer to show up nor make you less likely to catch an STI, it'll help with treatment of those issues but it won't stop them from actually happening.

---
The commercial says that Church isn't for perfect people, I guess that's why I'm an atheist.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1