LogFAQs > #979197671

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	It bothers me when Roman Numeral clocks have IV for 4
Hornezz 03/05/24 8:39:29 AM #13:	Both IIII and IV are valid Roman numerals. Both were used interchangeably in ancient times. Euripides posted... IIII isn't a Roman Numeral, though Revelation34 posted... No they shouldn't. IIII Isn't a Roman numeral. False. --- In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes. <cite>Hornezz posted [p:979197671] in It bothers... [t:80713287]...</cite> <quote>Both IIII and IV are valid Roman numerals. Both were used interchangeably in ancient times.Euripides posted... </cite><quote>IIII isn't a Roman Numeral, though</quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite><quote>No they shouldn't. IIII Isn't a Roman numeral.</quote>False. --- In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1