LogFAQs > #979076016

Will_VIIII posted...

No. Studies revaled that listening to misinformation (even with the intent to simply know what's being said) can result in you recalling the misinformation later (months or years even) as something you recall as fact

But don't you think there is value in being able to say exactly why you disagree or think a particular pundit is dangerous? It took all of three weeks for Levin to ramp up from "you're a bad American if you criticize Isreals response" to "YOURE NOT A REAL JEW IF YOU SYMPATHIZE WITH PALESTINE! ALL PALESTINIANS ARE HAMAS! IF YOU SUPPORT PALESTINE YOU ARE A NAZI!"
I think you need to have specific examples on why someone is a dangerous fuckwit and exactly what they've said. However:

UnicornRaline posted...

It falls apart when you try to bring up rationale or logic. In some of their minds there is no logic to their hate, aside from attracting the money of other hate-filled people.

This is true. 99% of these drones will dismiss anything you say or play the "you took it out of context" card. I've argued with people about Trumps 1/6 speech, they say "he said to PEACEFULLY fight! You're taking it out of context!" We watch the last 5 minutes of his speech, bot ONCE does he mention being peaceful. Their response: "duh well I could've sworn that's what he said, it was probably edited!"