LogFAQs > #978626415

Baha05 posted...

Its entirely relevant to the fact that while yes there is no proof that they advertised it as such they arent shying away from it either because it is selling their game.

And it doesnt negate the fact that a style cannot be copyrighted but characters can and there are obviously legal protections from parodies. You can still see that the developers did this on purpose. Its not even remotely a distraction tangent but a part of the bigger picture here because the notion of Pokemon with guns is this games identity now because it is constantly being reinforced by the virtue of how the characters look for the Pals.

And thats why I think while yes it was never marketed as such because there might be legal problems with doing that, it is a clear case of using a specific art and character style close to Pokemon that it can generate hype when you add the guns to them.

If they didn't market the game as Pokemon with guns then they didn't market the game as Pokemon with guns.

Sure you can write about all sorts of shit but I really don't care right now, I'm not in the mood to discuss that bs again. I specifically asked the person who said the game was marketed as Pokemon with guns to show said marketing, marketing that doesn't exist.

You can go on about art style, you can go on about features the game has and you can go on about how people online decided to interpret shit, it's irrelevant to what I'd asked.

Did the devs market the game as Pokemon with guns? The answer is no unless you can actually find such marketing and I've not seen it, I've only seen people on the internet say it is but that's not official marketing.

Do you get yet that I'm really not in the mood to get into the models and copyright shit again?