LogFAQs > #977124912

LoZguy709 posted...

Does anyone know the Green Party's argument for impeding in a presidential election with an incumbent Democrat that passed one of the largest clean energy bills after the previous Republican currently seeking office again did everything to bring the country back to outdated, harmful energy sources, thereby influencing the global economy for the worse? I'd really fucking like to know.

I'd much rather see them use this stamina to get Democrats to more effectively prioritize the climate crisis.

Pre-Jill Stein, I always thought the US Green Party should focus on House, state and local races first. Build up a cohort that's governed and passed some legislation and then shoot for Senate and POTUS.

Might also have more like-minded people to work with in Congress, if they did that nationwide.

As it stands today under Jill Stein, it seems IMO like the Greens in the US are a de facto Kremlin franchise, so anything they can do to pave the way for Trump just seems to make sense.