LogFAQs > #975876520

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	it is now illegal to tell the mods to "eat shit"
Grimlyn 09/05/23 2:32:04 PM #38:	Lopen posted... Do you think about the hundreds, thousands of people you know anything about much at all on a day to day, month to month, year to year basis. Probably not 95%+ of them. Bane fits in that 95% for me. That's all it meant. Ulti clearly doesnt for Steiner and Emerald Egg. A LOT of people clearly don't fit that for Steiner since apparently he's a serial harrasser of people he has beef with on the board/discord. But you want to get literal to "get me" you go right ahead. What are you talking about? I need you to understand how much leaps you are making based off of nothing but some weird defensiveness to an argument that I haven't at all made. My second paragraph was acknowledging that you made an actual argument in the last topic - one that I partially agree with, that yes remembering something about somebody =/= obsessing over. The point you are now falling back on. My critique is about you here and now misrepresenting what you were arguing against. If you want to go back to your original, honest argument, then my job's done. --- http://gmun.moe/ffcc GuessMyUserName's account's very own account! <cite>Grimlyn posted [p:975876520] in it is now ... [t:80556684]...</cite> <quote>Lopen posted... </cite><quote>Do you think about the hundreds, thousands of people you know anything about much at all on a day to day, month to month, year to year basis.Probably not 95%+ of them. Bane fits in that 95% for me. That's all it meant. Ulti clearly doesnt for Steiner and Emerald Egg. A LOT of people clearly don't fit that for Steiner since apparently he's a serial harrasser of people he has beef with on the board/discord. But you want to get literal to "get me" you go right ahead.</quote>What are you talking about? I need you to understand how much leaps you are making based off of nothing but some weird defensiveness to an argument that I haven't at all made.My second paragraph was acknowledging that you made an actual argument in the last topic - one that I partially agree with, that yes remembering something about somebody =/= obsessing over. The point you are now falling back on.My critique is about you here and now misrepresenting what you were arguing against. If you want to go back to your original, honest argument, then my job's done. --- http://gmun.moe/ffccGuessMyUserName's account's very own account!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1