LogFAQs > #974913108

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWe seriously stop electing people older than 55.
Solid_Sonic
07/18/23 9:51:36 AM
#18:


famfam posted...
both parties had options that were under 65. they didn't win their party's nomination because the constituencies preferred the older ones

Which, really, is the weight we bear for continuing to insist on making the two-party dynamic such a big deal. The party is more interested in keeping power than doing right and they want candidates who won't rock the boat TOO much but can present a compelling candidate against "the other guy." Candidate nomination has become a soulless science and one that doesn't care what you want, you will TAKE what you are given by the party.

If you want to vote for candidates who stand for what you believe in then you need to tear this down because then the cream that rises to the top actually has a varying and diverse political spectrum that covers a lot of different solutions for leadership and one where the party doesn't wield all the power of selection.

---
Surely if I stick up for rich people on the Internet I'll eventually get a sweet job offer from them, right?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1