LogFAQs > #973864258

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 404: Fox Tuckers Out, CNN Sours On Lemon
RuneterranSnap
06/01/23 5:31:59 PM
#339:


Chaeix posted...
Question: is this allowing them to sue for costing them money because of the interruption of the strike, or rather for costing money because they deliberately wasted company materials by leaving wet concrete in the trucks?

major difference in what that ruling means depending on what the answer to that question is

cause Im all for strikes but it doesnt seem unfair for a company to sue if inventory is deliberately damaged or wasted beyond what is actually necessary in the course of a strike
Sounds like yet another good reason to consider the SC illegitimate and completely disregard them.

I hope any union that gets sued following this just completely refuses to cooperate or even acknowledge the lawsuits.

Edit: Meant in reply to the initial announcement, but I think we all know they're doing it to open the door more against them.

---
Joyrock/DSFlashlight/OctilIery
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1