LogFAQs > #973818262

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

But being dishonest in what was said. He asked if not disclosing would be considered rape by deception? Naturally everyone's reaction was to tell him how awful that it. He needed it explained to him that the question itself, not just the wording, was inappropriate because it painted trans folks as rapists. He apologized and said he didn't realize the implications of his question. The only thing he said "agree to disagree" with was when asking royic if he considered psychological harm as pertinent information. Royic then explained that only if you know that having sex with a particular person would harm them psychologically, you should tell them. But otherwise it's on the person with the weird hangups to be up front about it.

At that point CSCA33 took the "agree to disagree" part from his conversation with royic and said he was still implying trans people are rapists.

Again, if you haven't read it I can make you screen shots so you can see for yourself.