LogFAQs > #973798328

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


No, I do. You obviously dont since you think it means something is true and false at the same time.

I've very clearly spelled out my argument, provided citations, and explained problems and what you need to overcome to solve them for your argument, and all you have done is just go, "LOL NO UR WRONG".

Thats because you are wrong. You dont know what subject means and are attacking a definition you made up.

Reading your posts, it seems like your definition of subjective is just "anything that can be observed", which is quite different from the philosophical definition of subjective, which is "that which exists only in the mind of the observer."

No, subjective means something is experienced or measured by a living thing rather than objectively measured.

Your two options for subjective morality are as follows;

Option A) There is no right or wrong, only whatever an individual believes to be right or wrong, and all individual judgements on this must be equally valid, otherwise it is an objective moral framework.

Option B) An action can be both right and wrong at the same time, and ALL actions MUST be right and wrong at the same time.

Nope, its C: things can be subjectively right or wrong.