LogFAQs > #973794756

SwayM posted...

Yes, the evidence suggests your evidence is wrong. That is why people are using it against you.

The logical position has always been that this woman paid for a bike that wasn't in use and was forced by the group to return it. All the receipts and the video back that up. The video shows the teen invading her space and forcing her to returnit.

In absolutely no world would it be logical for them to fight over this bike if she paid for it. They can use the one that was still available.

You're doing yourself no favours here.

The evidence shows that they were using the same bike for over an hour before she arrived, it shows they've been consistently been stopping and starting the rentals again so they could take advantage of the reduced fare, and if she didn't intervene in their pattern of usage then they'd have rented the bike again. The evidence in the video corroborates their testimony that they were indeed still using the bike, that she did shove them away from the terminal and flashed her card so she could take advantage of a shitty situation that she started, and the video does show her faking and pretending like she's being assaulted. The evidence included in her receipts does indeed show that the fight was pointless because only a minute after being forced to return the bike she started a fight over she was able to rent a different one with no issue.

Like Idk what to tell you man, she started a pointless fight, made an unconvincing attempt at trying to appear like a victim, and lost.