LogFAQs > #972368910

All that was said was that they couldn't prove it without a shadow of a doubt. It's a 3 years old domestic violence case. Literally all that feasibly happened was that they couldn't prove Roiland was the abuser or that the abuse even happened because there are no longer easy bodily evidence they can use. Being unable to prove something with due diligence by itself does not speak to if a person is innocent or guilty, so it's a pretty pointless discussion.