LogFAQs > #971736774

t5yvxc posted...

I can get behind this.

But with the contingency that the items go through a review as well. The child needs to actually require what that money is being spent on. That money shouldn't be going to things that child doesn't actually need, and just an excuse for the person getting the check to splurge.

Need receipts, and clear reasons to back the receipts.

I don't get this stuff. Why is the parent receiving aid and the child suggested to be under such strict scrutiny but not the parent that's providing child support? If receipts for the kid need to be itemized then why not the father's? Prove you can't provide more, show every receipt you spend and we can have a discussion on whether you need all that liquor, weed, fast food, and video games.