LogFAQs > #970730326

NeatoAnAccount posted...

Also "objectively bad" works perfectly. It communicates the intended message compactly and everyone knows what it means.

I know what people mean when they say it, but it's rarely ever followed up with an explanation of why it's objectively bad, so I tend not to take it seriously when it's said since it's used more to give their personal take more credibility.

Like if you're going to argue something is objectively bad, then you should be able to discuss the objective metrics that make it bad instead of just saying so or saying enough people agree to make it so. Otherwise it doesn't actually enhance the conversation and becomes a word that leads to topics like this.