LogFAQs > #969879840

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Newer gamers see the games of 1980-2006 as weak/crotchety etc.
TomNook 12/03/22 6:23:39 AM #14:	Revelation34 posted... Good. That shit was fucking annoying. I mean, it's just about performing skills for a longer unbroken period. It's like how when a modern audience plays Mega Man nowadays; the games include a rewind feature. So when they are fighting a robot master and they get hit, they just use the rewind feature so that they don't get hit. It's technically allowed by the modern sensibilities, but it cheats them of the journey, because while they are technically beating the game, they are no longer doing it in a full unbroken passage like it was originally intended, because the challenge was about stringing together a series of sucessess. --- Bells, bells, bells! <cite>TomNook posted [p:969879840] in Newer game... [t:80259028]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite><quote>Good. That shit was fucking annoying.</quote>I mean, it's just about performing skills for a longer unbroken period.It's like how when a modern audience plays Mega Man nowadays; the games include a rewind feature. So when they are fighting a robot master and they get hit, they just use the rewind feature so that they don't get hit. It's technically allowed by the modern sensibilities, but it cheats them of the journey, because while they are technically beating the game, they are no longer doing it in a full unbroken passage like it was originally intended, because the challenge was about stringing together a series of sucessess. --- Bells, bells, bells!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1