LogFAQs > #968434226

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 394: Espionage a Trois
masterplum 10/02/22 9:51:10 AM #379:	Samurai7 posted... Regardless if it can be tangibly proven that it's substantially better for health and for the environment a couple dollars extra for gasoline is worth it. And I run a business that relies on RVs who guzzle tons of gas. I think that is the question right? I think California was hoping it could sway companies into making the better fuel for the environment for everyone and so far that hasnt succeeded. If Californians want to keep paying more for this then that is their prerogative, but you dont want to incite a backlash that torpedos all environmental reform --- https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdWiElvIQAAQpBt.jpg <cite>masterplum posted [p:968434226] in Politics C... [t:80149776]...</cite> <quote>Samurai7 posted... </cite><quote>Regardless if it can be tangibly proven that it's substantially better for health and for the environment a couple dollars extra for gasoline is worth it. And I run a business that relies on RVs who guzzle tons of gas.</quote>I think that is the question right? I think California was hoping it could sway companies into making the better fuel for the environment for everyone and so far that hasnt succeeded. If Californians want to keep paying more for this then that is their prerogative, but you dont want to incite a backlash that torpedos all environmental reform --- https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdWiElvIQAAQpBt.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1