LogFAQs > #967444528

adjl posted...

At best, you can claim he peddled conspiracy theories that he had not verified for personal profit with no regard for the impact that would have on the individuals he was explicitly attacking, which is only marginally better than knowingly committing such defamation. In his own words, he believes it happened now that he's met with parents, and that should really have been a very early step before reporting on the matter at all. He chose not to do that, so even if the beliefs he stated were genuine, he absolutely should be held accountable for the harms that followed that decision.

Yeah... I'm not disagreeing with any of that. But you claimed he was peddling something he knew to be false but I think he genuinely believed it