LogFAQs > #966331873

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Akron police fired 90 shots at unarmed, fleeing man
fire_bolt 07/04/22 2:24:53 PM #173:	Dark_Spiret posted... because that doesnt have jack shit to do with it. it has everything to do with the training involved. prior to the 80's you didnt have cops feel like they needed to mag dump everyone at the slightest bit of resistance and that was before the 1986 machine gun ban where you could actually get a full auto uzi or m16. This is the dumbest fucking attempt at a rebuttal. Cops shot him because he shot at them first? Cool, then if he had not been allowed to have a gun at all the cops would not have shot him fucking 60 times. Sorry you're not able to trace simple logic --- If it was about babies we'd have universal maternal care. There would be no charge no matter how complex the delivery. But its not about babies, is it? <cite>fire_bolt posted [p:966331873] in Akron poli... [t:80081255]...</cite> <quote>Dark_Spiret posted...</cite> <quote> because that doesnt have jack shit to do with it. it has everything to do with the training involved. prior to the 80's you didnt have cops feel like they needed to mag dump everyone at the slightest bit of resistance and that was before the 1986 machine gun ban where you could actually get a full auto uzi or m16. </quote> This is the dumbest fucking attempt at a rebuttal. Cops shot him because he shot at them first? Cool, then if he had not been allowed to have a gun at all the cops would not have shot him fucking 60 times. Sorry you're not able to trace simple logic --- If it was about babies we'd have universal maternal care. There would be no charge no matter how complex the delivery. But its not about babies, is it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1