LogFAQs > #966048719

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSupreme Court Strikes down Conceal and Carry Law Bans...
Veedrock-
06/23/22 4:53:16 PM
#29:


Voting as a right: "We should have zero to no obstacles."
Guns as a right: "We need as many obstacles as possible."

Y'all really won't like that comparison but it's valid. It's quite the double standard, which hopefully points out the real issue here: guns as a right. Tackle that problem, then you can put up obstacles to ownership.

beefcake71090 posted...
I feel like if the Supreme Court's job is to interpret and apply the constitution, it would be pretty difficult to justify if they didn't uphold the 2nd amendment.
This should be everyone's stance. Get on your congresspeople to effect change, not the court. I find it especially hypocritical that people are saying SCOTUS shouldn't overturn a decades old ruling because precedent, but believe they should overturn a centuries old amendment because feelings. Like damn.

---
My friends call me Vee.
I'm not your friend, buddy.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1