LogFAQs > #965851251

I think my argument would have been better stated if, instead of arguing that he, himself, doesn't have charisma, which I accept is incorrect, I should have said that the "charisma" of the Trumpism movement in general has outgrown and surpassed him, and is now its own beast regardless of what charisma he currently has or does not have, and can very much live on without him/with somebody else as the figurehead. I was basically trying to say that the message existed before him, and will live on without him, even though he gave it new life and audience. I shouldn't have said he doesn't have charisma, because he obviously helped feed said message.