LogFAQs > #965394729

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial 2
BlueCrystalTear 05/29/22 9:59:21 PM #199:	The first one was hilarious, but it moved too fast for me to be able to appreciate all the details of the sprite work and evidence. Since it went WAY too fast. The second one... the Amber/Dahlia comparison sounds pretty spot-on. They have this appearance to them to mask their cold-blooded psychopathy. The April May in the third one ALSO works because of how she can switch personas on a dime from the teary-eyed facade to the brutal truth. Now that she's been unmasked, her career is fucked. I am firmly aboard the #BoycottAmberHeard train. I will never see Aquaman 2 unless she is removed from it. Rewatching her breakdown... she really thinks this ONE statement that she LIED that Johnny endorsed has made her HARASSED and HUMILIATED. She sued him over literal nothing. Rottenborn talked about statements that Johnny made... WHAT statements? Adam Waldman is NOT Johnny Depp. Trauma from statements that one lawyer nobody had heard of until this trial had made. Triggers from... a "hoax." Uhhhh... WHAT? There was no negative press covfefe about those statements until Amber brought it upon herself. She "wants her voice back" but... she's been using that voice at this trial and it's been revealed how ugly of a person she is. Jury instructions... not sure what all that was. I did watch it, but I'm pretty green to all this legal stuff. From what I gather, these mostly went Depp's way aside from one thing - Waldman not having free speech protections. But even so, those had nothing to do with Johnny, didn't cause Amber's downfall, and were proven wholly true. Which shouldn't matter because there's no chance Amber wins anything. She outright testified that she wrote the op-ed with malicious intent. It was over once she said that. Pretty sure this is open-and-shut. Johnny wins - but I don't know how much $$. Amber's not getting a cent. Just starting the closing statements though. Camille is already pointing out all the things the jury needs to remember. ZannoL posted... What do you guys think the verdict will be this upcoming Tuesday? https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/5/7/AAaB-xAADRux.jpg omg - Johnny's such a cool customer while Amber is... YIPES. A+ pic! --- BlueCrystalTear \| You're living your own life. You're you. #FearTheDeer \| ((FREE HUGS)) <cite>BlueCrystalTear posted [p:965394729] in Johnny Dep... [t:80023967]...</cite> <quote>The first one was hilarious, but it moved too fast for me to be able to appreciate all the details of the sprite work and evidence. Since it went WAY too fast. The second one... the Amber/Dahlia comparison sounds pretty spot-on. They have this appearance to them to mask their cold-blooded psychopathy. The April May in the third one ALSO works because of how she can switch personas on a dime from the teary-eyed facade to the brutal truth. Now that she's been unmasked, her career is fucked. I am firmly aboard the #BoycottAmberHeard train. I will never see Aquaman 2 unless she is removed from it. Rewatching her breakdown... she really thinks this ONE statement that she LIED that Johnny endorsed has made her HARASSED and HUMILIATED. She sued him over literal nothing. Rottenborn talked about statements that Johnny made... WHAT statements? Adam Waldman is NOT Johnny Depp. Trauma from statements that one lawyer nobody had heard of until this trial had made. Triggers from... a "hoax." Uhhhh... WHAT? There was no negative press covfefe about those statements until Amber brought it upon herself. She "wants her voice back" but... she's been using that voice at this trial and it's been revealed how ugly of a person she is. Jury instructions... not sure what all that was. I did watch it, but I'm pretty green to all this legal stuff. From what I gather, these mostly went Depp's way aside from one thing - Waldman not having free speech protections. But even so, those had nothing to do with Johnny, didn't cause Amber's downfall, and were proven wholly true. Which shouldn't matter because there's no chance Amber wins anything. She outright testified that she wrote the op-ed with malicious intent. It was over once she said that. Pretty sure this is open-and-shut. Johnny wins - but I don't know how much $$. Amber's not getting a cent. Just starting the closing statements though. Camille is already pointing out all the things the jury needs to remember. <quote>ZannoL posted... </cite>What do you guys think the verdict will be this upcoming Tuesday? https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/5/7/AAaB-xAADRux.jpg</quote>omg - Johnny's such a cool customer while Amber is... YIPES. A+ pic! --- BlueCrystalTear \| You're living your own life. You're you. #FearTheDeer \| ((FREE HUGS))</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1