LogFAQs > #965220890

Yeah, she should have clarified that donation was based on increments that the ACLU could attest to. The 13 month stagnation period and then "uh oh, Johnny's suing me, shucks" defense she put out for the jury was not a smart play for her, because it made her look shady and/or inept. And "pledge vs. donate is same thing" is insulting to the jury and contributes to her ineptness and narcissistic character.

Even though I said I've seen enough, this trial still has me clicking on clips/tiktok mashups. I love Dennison's cross exam with Schnell, the way he built up to "yeah, these 3 hashtags are negative to AH and none are related to her team's main dispute against Walden's comments...but how bout that sweet Justice for Johnny, eh?"

Complete bullshit to blame the turd on the dog eating too much hash. I'm glad they didn't bother wasting the court's time bringing in an expert to set that straight though...just let it hang there as the complete bullshit it is.

And is it just me or does Adam Walden, the tone of his voice, sound ALOT like ThatUmbrellaGuy? I couldn't find this opinion anywhere else, it just sounds like the same voice with a southern twang to it.