LogFAQs > #965179593

CassandraCain posted...

Hey I don't think even the Phantom Thieves could fix her, that palace would be so utterly distorted that they'd be lost the moment they walked in. I imagine it would look like combining every MC Escher painting together.

Sounds about right. Her distortion is absolutely insane, and who knows how much it covers. Wouldn't surprise me if it was all of Hollywood, since she sees herself as more famous than she actually was before this.

GavsEvans123 posted...

I saw a suggestion elsewhere that many of the people who still support Amber at this stage aren't supporting her specifically, but rather supporting her for the sake of Me Too because they think if Amber is seen as an abuser, this will damage Me Too's credibility.

I can see their thinking, but wouldn't being caught defending an abuser and trying to cover up their wrongdoing for the sake of the narrative do far more damage to Me Too's credibility in the long run?

The only people who support Amber Turd are abusers themselves and this is their attempt at an excuse. Ms. Turd has already done the damage and her reputation is irrecoverable. Continuing to support her under the guise of "Me Too" means Me Too condones abuse if a woman is doing it. In other words, abusive men are horrible, but abusive women are A-Okay. Sexist hypocrisy, that is.

Yes, I am aware that not all "Me Too" people see it that way. It's just a select few who lack the logic. The rest condemn abuse in all its forms. The movement can recover from this but it's gonna be turbulent if there aren't enough people condemning Amber Turd for trying to leverage this movement to get away with her lies. Can't let one bad apple spoil the bunch.