LogFAQs > #965176589

Some of the questions were out of line from Elaine because she knew that he couldn't answer.

She may lose her bar license over this. As an attorney herself, Elaine shouldn't be asking another attorney to violate attorney-client privilege laws. It would be a deserving comeuppance for the henchwoman here.

Waldman obliterated their counter-claim AND showed that Amber's witnesses were liars. Like I said above, the counter-claim was a terrible idea because it forces the jury to pick one side or the other, not "guilty, pay up" or "not guilty, don't pay up." By making such an unrealistic counter-claim, Amber Turd has forced them to side with Johnny. Her counter-suit has ZERO basis and is merely the product of her own distortions. If the Phantom Thieves were American, this would be an optimal way for them to gain notoriety. Her Palace has gotta be INSANE.

I do hope that Camille, in her closing arguments for Johnny, points out all these obvious data points to the jury. That Waldman's statements had nothing to do with Amber Turd being accused of being a monster, that her own lies torpedoed her career, that her witnesses contradicted themselves, etc. Just remind all of these obvious things because a lot of people who DO end up on juries are the same kinds of people who would give an item a one-star review on Amazon because "it came a day late" or criticize a National Park for "having nothing to do" when they chose to go to such a nature preserve.

I so wish I'd been able to watch yesterday (had a psych appointment and a funeral visitation). I will need to watch a recap because some of this sounds amazing. I got WAAAAAAY too much I'm behind on. Thanks for the updates - I appreciate them!