LogFAQs > #965170747

If you are trying to do it from a coding perspective it's machine learning. If you are trying to do it from a linguistic perspective it's debate or philosophy (depending on if there is an expected/actualized answer or not). From a code perspective there is no better way to do what you are talking about than machine learning as brute forcing through code is *vastly* superior to anything you can do by hand. Much like how making something recursive or inverse can make some logical steps super trivial compared to the alternative (something, something "Tower of Hanoi") things that are commonly brute forced through ML is done explicitly that way because the alternatives are either unreasonably hard or impossible to do otherwise. Inversely if you are not talking about the code itself and instead on recognizing problems debate is a good way to recognize when someone's desired end goal and what they are saying are not equivalents or when a statement being made is not actually giving the information that they want it to say.