LogFAQs > #965155513

Amber's trying to make eye contact with the jury so they know what moves she's making to win the game. The problem is that the "game" is defamation and not Survivor, so these people aren't voting for her to win a million dollars.

It seems as if Amber's witnesses are contradicting her. Anyone who still supports her after this gets blocked because they're condoning abuse and are therefore a likely abuser themselves. The alt-right nuts who are using this are also awful. Like... this is just ONE case where a harpy abused a man. It does not exemplify all cases.

I got bored of all these video deppositions that amount to a whole lotta nothing. "Oh, Amber told me so" crap. If they dismiss the counter-claim because there's zero foundation for it, it will allow for the option of the neutral verdict where nobody gets anything from the other. Right now, the jury has to pick someone to pay the other. Amber has no case, so...

And yes, that spelling was deliberate.