LogFAQs > #964777120

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Controvery over new MTG art that features bears.
DeepsPraw 05/04/22 1:53:46 AM #47:	ChichiriMuyo posted... Lizbeth Eden wasn't removed from the content creator program for any MtG art she created, she was removed for using MtG related art to promote her Only Fans. She was literally using their product to sell her porn, and it's their right to sever ties with her for that. Nothing about this art or literally hundreds of other "sexualized" pieces of MtG art violates their policy because it's actually a very liberal policy. What she did went well beyond the bounds. Fair enough. I wasn't able to find any official word from WOTC on any sexual content policy. Still think it's awfully strange that straight-up fetish art is on an official card, especially nowadays. --- pepsi for tv-game <cite>DeepsPraw posted [p:964777120] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>ChichiriMuyo posted... </cite> <quote>Lizbeth Eden wasn't removed from the content creator program for any MtG art she created, she was removed for using MtG related art to promote her Only Fans. She was literally using their product to sell her porn, and it's their right to sever ties with her for that. Nothing about this art or literally hundreds of other "sexualized" pieces of MtG art violates their policy because it's actually a very liberal policy. What she did went well beyond the bounds.</quote>Fair enough. I wasn't able to find any official word from WOTC on any sexual content policy. Still think it's awfully strange that straight-up fetish art is on an official card, especially nowadays. --- pepsi for tv-game </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1