LogFAQs > #963831198

Punished_Blinx posted...

People laugh at almost anything in a live show. I doubt what Rock had said had actually sunk in. But if you want to use it as proof that Will Smith faked being offended so he could act like a lunatic for whatever reason then you do you

Yeah because he didn't want his wife to be mad at him

. It's pretty obvious why you're getting so rustled over tame statements when you have invested yourself into that narrative already.

"tame" statements like when someone attacks someone else and screams like a child. You claim both people are in the wrong but can't explain why....

No pointing out the gigantic flaws in your argument is not "Being too invested in that narrative" and you know it. Hence why all you can do is ignore every point people make.

Comparing a 'look' to a joke making fun of someone's appearance made in front of millions of people means the allegory doesn't work sorry. Try find a better one.

"I can't respond to that point so I won't."

Typical. You know your entire "narrative" is totall bullshit and are too cowardly to admit it

Chris Rock did nothing wrong.

Will Smith was acting like a lunatic and so people saying that's bad.

"Well maybe Chris Rock thought it would offend him and maybe he didn't." isn't nuance, it doesn't make this complicated. This is obvious. This doesn't mean those people are deranged, nor that every situation is this cut and dry.

If it was any random joe and not Will Smith or someone like him. They would be arrested.

And you know this is true. No matter how many points you ignore, how many lies you tell, how many times you change your story and how many times you say "narrative."

If you attack a comedian for telling a joke and then scream like a child. You're in the wrong and the comedian isn't.